Skip to main content
LawSphereX

PARWINDER KUMAR v. HRTC AND ANR

Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh

Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2020-12-28. PARWINDER KUMAR v. HRTC AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No 6275 of 2020 with CWP Nos. 6276, 6277 & 6315 of 2020. th Date of Decision : 28 December, 2020. 1. CWP No. 6275 of 2020. Bhagat Ram ……. Petitioner. Versus H. R. T. C. & Another ...... Respondents. 2. CWP No. 6276 of 2020. Kapil Dev …... Petitioner Versus HRTC & Another ….. Respondents. 3. CWP No. 6277 of 2020 Parwinder Kumar …... Petitioner Versus HRTC & Another ….. Respondents 4. CWP No. 6315 of 2020 Palvinder Singh …... Petitioner Versus HRTC & Another ….. Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice L. Narayana Swamy, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate COURT PROCEEDINGS CONVENED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Anoop Chitkara, Judge (oral).

The petitioners, who are working as Piece Meal Workers with the respondent-Corporation, have come up before this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to convert their services on contract basis. In this regard the petitioners have already made representations, which are still pending before the authorities concerned. 2. Notice. Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. In view of the nature of the order, we propose to pass, no response is required from the respondents. 4. Consequently, the petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondents/authorities to decide the representations of the petitioners, in accordance with law, within one month. While deciding the petitioners’ representations, the respondents/authorities shall also take into consideration the judgment delivered by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWPOA No.

1517 of 2019, titled Prem Singh versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Another , decided on 18. 12. 2019. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach this Court again, in case they still feel aggrieved and dissatisfied with the outcome of the representation. Pending application(s), if any, are closed. (L. Narayana Swamy) Chief Justice. (Anoop Chitkara) Judge th 28 December, 2020 (ps)

Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.