RAJU YADAV v. VEDRAM SHARMA
Court: High Court of Chhattisgarh
Bench: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RAJANI DUBEY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Chhattisgarh judgment dated 2020-12-12. RAJU YADAV v. VEDRAM SHARMA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR NATIONAL LOK ADALAT Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Member - Lok Adalat : Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate MAC No. 265 of 2018 • Raju Yadav S/o Shri Samaru Yadav Aged About 41 Years R/o Dumartarai, Police Station Mana Camp, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.................. Claimant, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Vedram Sharma S/o Shri Pilu Ram Sharma Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Laxminagar, Supela, Police Station Supela, Tahsil Bhilai- 3, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, (Driver Of Offending Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration C G 04/ J A 1752), District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2.
Anil Kumar Partho S/o Shri V C Partho Aged About 36 Years R/o P/a Durg Road, Kohka Chowk, Near Ajay Medical Stores, Bhilai, Supela Thana, Tahsil Bhilai-3, District Durg, Chhattisgarh, R/o Village Bhilai, Kohka, Police Station Supela, Tahsil Bhilai-3, District Durg, Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Offending Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration C G 04/ J A 1752). , District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3. Bajaj Alliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Through Manager, Bajaj Alliance General Company Ltd. Opposite Employment Office, Main Road, Pandari, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of Offending Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration C G 04/ J A 1752). , District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Appellant : Ms. Soniya Kuldeep, Advocate For Respondent No.
3 : Shri Utsav Mahiswar, Advocate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AWARD (Passed on 12. 12. 2020) The contesting parties to this appeal have amicably settled/compromised the dispute which is subject matter of the appeal, voluntarily. We have also found that the terms and conditions of compromise/settlement arrived at between the contesting parties are just, proper and legal. There is no legal impediment to compromise and hence are acceptable. 2. We accordingly accept the compromise/settlement proposed by the parties and order that the respondent No. 3/Insurance Company shall pay -2- Rs. 35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand only) by way of compensation in addition to the amount awarded by the learned Tribunal to the appellant within 60 days from today, otherwise interest @ 9% per annum from today shall also be payable till its realization of the additional amount of compensation. 3.
It is directed that total enhanced amount of Rs. 35,000/- shall be paid to the claimant/appellant through transfer of fund in his bank account. 4. A copy of the docket (compromise arrived at between the parties) be sent to the Claims Tribunal along with its record, if any, and a copy of the award passed today, forthwith. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Sandeep Dubey) Judge Member Lok Adalat Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur Pkd
Source: High Court of Chhattisgarh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.