CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SHRI. R EZUNG AND 2 ORS
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2024-04-08. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SHRI. R EZUNG AND 2 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC020006642023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I. A. (Crl. )/25/2023 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION GOVT OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SP, ECONOMIC OFFENCES BRANCH HAVING ITS OFFICE AT CGO COMPLEX, F-WING (GROUND FLOOR), DF BLOCK, SALT LAKE CITY, KOLKATA VERSUS SHRI. R EZUNG AND 2 ORS THE THEN SECRETARY DEPT. OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY GOVT. OF NAGALAND Advocate for the Petitioner : BENDANGWABANG Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : I. A. (Crl. )/26/2023 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION GOVT OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE SP ECONOMIC OFFENCES BRANCH HAVING ITS OFFICE AT CGO COMPLEX F-WING (GROUND FLOOR) DF BLOCK SALT LAKE CITY KOLKATA VERSUS Page No. # 2/3 SHRI R EZUNG AND 2 ORS THE THEN SECRETARY DEPT. VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY GOVT. OF NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : BENDANGWABANG Advocate for : appearing for SHRI R EZUNG AND 2 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR.
JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 08. 04. 2024 Heard Mr. Bendangwabang, learned Standing Counsel for the applicant CBI. The present application is filed for condonation of delay of 150 days in preferring the connected I. A. being I. A. (Crl)/26/2023 for restoration of the criminal appeal being Crl. A. /3/2021 which was dismissed for non prosecution by this Court under its order dated 26. 05. 2023. The CBI preferred an appeal being Crl. A. /3/2021 under Section 378(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the Judgment and Order dated 05. 12. 2019 passed by the learned Special Judge, CBI, Kohima in CBI Case RC No. 1(E)/2007, CBI vrs. Shri R. Ezung and Ors, whereby the respondents were acquitted for offences under Section 120B/409 IPC read with Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Notices were issued to the respondents. Notice to the Page No. # 3/3 respondent Nos. 1 and 2 has duly been served and respondent No.
3 did not participate in the trial and notice is returned in this regard. Thereafter, the petitioner also allowed to take steps through dasti and such Steps has been taken and an affidavit has been filed. Perused the same and service is accepted. The cause of delay has been explained at paragraph 4 (a) to (i) of the present application. The explanation given in the aforesaid paragraph shows that the applicant was not negligent in approaching the Court beyond the prescribed period of limitation and there were sufficient causes which prevented the applicant to approach this Court within time. Accordingly, the present IA stands allowed. The delay stands condoned. Registry to list the IA(Crl)/26/2023 in the next week. IA(Crl)/25/2023 stands disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.