Skip to main content
LawSphereX

NAKU RAM @ NANU RAM v. STATE

Court: High Court of Rajasthan

Bench: PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2020-12-02. NAKU RAM @ NANU RAM v. STATE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

(1 of 2) [CRLMB-13872/2020] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13872/2020 1. Naku Ram @ Nanu Ram S/o Sh. Daula, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Amalikhera, P. s. Ghantali, Dist. Pratapgarh (Raj. ). (Presently Lodged In District Jail, Pratapgarh). 2. Ramesh S/o Sh. Daula, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Amalikhera, P. s. Ghantali, Dist. Pratapgarh (Raj. ). (Presently Lodged In District Jail, Pratapgarh). ----Petitioners Versus State, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shambhoo Singh Rathore, on VC For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI Order 02/12/2020 In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, lawyers have been advised to refrain from coming to the Courts. This Court has perused the material available on record. The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.

150/2019 of Police Station Ghantali, District Pratapgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 457 and 380 IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr. P. C. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that conclusion of the proceedings is likely to take some time and without expressing any opinion on (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13872/2020] the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr. P. C. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr. P. C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Naku Ram @ Nanu Ram S/o Sh. Daula and (2) Ramesh S/o Sh. Daula shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 150/2019 of Police Station Ghantali, District Pratapgarh provided each of them execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.

50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The prosecution shall be at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail of the petitioner, in this case, if the petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal activity within a period of one year. (DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J. 51-Nirmala/Sanjay/-

Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.