Skip to main content
LawSphereX

GAYA PRASAD v. BOARD OF REVENUE

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-24. GAYA PRASAD v. BOARD OF REVENUE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY DWIVEDI th ON THE 24 OF JANUARY, 2024 MISC. PETITION No. 3431 of 2020 BETWEEN:- GAYA PRASAD S/O SHRI SADHURAM, AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST R/O VILLAGE- DOKARA BHATHKALA TEHSIL MAUGANJ REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONER (SHRI KARAN SINGH PARIHAR - ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF SHRI HIMANSHU SHUKLA - ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER) AND 1. BOARD OF REVENUE THR. REVISIONAL AUTHORITY, MOTI MAHAL, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER REWA, DIVISION REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. UMAKANT S/O LATE GAJADHAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE DOHARA BHATHKALA, TEH. MAUGANJ, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) 4. SHIVAKANT S/O LATE GAJADHAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE DOHARA BHATHKALA, TEH. MAUGANJ, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. SHASHIKANT S/O LATE GAJADHAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE DOHARA BHATHKALA, TEH. MAUGANJ, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. MUS. RAMBATI W/O LATE GAJADHAR RAM, R/O VILLAGE DOHARA BHATHKALA, TEH.

MAUGANJ, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. MUS. BEDVATI W/O LATE RAMAKANT, R/O VILLAGE DOHARA BHATHKALA, TEH. MAUGANJ, DISTRICT REWA (MADHYA PRADESH) Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANIL Signing time: 1/25/2024 11:09:18 AM ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI ASHOK LALWANI - ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS. 3 TO 7) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER The counsel appearing for the petitioner has informed this Court that the sole petitioner has expired. 2. However, Shri Lalwani learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the petition is abated because the death of sole petitioner occurred on 23. 05. 2023 and no application for bringing legal heirs on record has been filed in time and as such, the petition is abated. 3. Considering the submission made by the counsel for the respondents, this petition is dismissed as abated. 4. However, the petitioner if so required, may take appropriate steps.

(SANJAY DWIVEDI) JUDGE ac/- Signature Not Verified Signed by: ANIL Signing time: 1/25/2024 11:09:18 AM

Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.