ISHWAR DAS BARA ALIAS SUNIL BARA ALIAS ESU ALIAS BHAGWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-04. ISHWAR DAS BARA ALIAS SUNIL BARA ALIAS ESU ALIAS BHAGWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A No. 7204 of 2020 Ishwar Das Bara @ Sunil Bara @ Esu @ Bhagwan … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : M/s. Satish Prasad, Advocate -------- The matter was taken up through Video Conferencing. Learned counsels for the parties had no objection with it and submitted that the audio and video qualities are good. --------- 04/ 04. 12. 2020. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25 (1-A), 25 (1-B) (a), 26, 35 of the Arms Act in connection with Kurdeg P. S Case No. 33 of 2012, corresponding to G. R No. 464 of 2012, S. T Case No. 44 of 2013 (A). By order dated 08. 03. 2013 passed in B. A No.
1654 of 2013, the petitioner was granted bail by this Court, but he misused the privilege of bail for more than six years. His bail bond was cancelled on 18. 05. 2013 and thereafter, he could be apprehended and was produced in the Court below on 09. 07. 2019. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has remained in custody for more than a year and has sufficiently been punished. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Ishwar Das Bara @ Sunil Bara @ Esu @ Bhagwan, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Simdega, in connection with Kurdeg P. S Case No. 33 of 2012, corresponding to G. R No. 464 of 2012, S. T Case No. 44 of 2013 (A).
However, the petitioner shall remain physically present in the Court below on each and every date fixed by the Court, unless the permission has been taken in advance for being represented through advocate on a particular date. This application, thus, stands allowed with the condition as above. (H. C. Mishra, J. ) BS/-
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.