KRISH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2025-01-21. KRISH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[2025:RJ-JD:3771] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 746/2025 Aakash Singh S/o Rakesh Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o E - 77, R. k. Colony , P. s. Subhash Nagar , Bhilwara (At Present Lodged In Dist Jail Bhilwara) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S. B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 238/2025 Krish S/o Dilip, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Near Radha Mandir , R. k Colony, P. s Nagar Dist Bhilwara (Raj) (At Present Lodged In Dist Jail Bhilwara) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sikander Khan Mr. Rakesh Matoria For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati,PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT Order 21/01/2025 1.
The instant bail applications have been filed by the applicants Aakash Singh S/o Rakesh Singh and Krish S/o Dilip under Section 483 BNSS against the order impugned passed by learned court below in connection with FIR No. 231/2024 registered at Police Station Pur District Bhilwara for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 109(1) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JD:3771] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-746/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that injured and applicants after attending programme were smoking cigarette at hotel and due to hot talks with each other, Dependra Singh attacked Rajendra Singh with knife and Dependra Singh attacked Devendra Singh also with knife. Learned counsel submits that applicants are behind the bars and trial may take long time to conclude thus, they deserve to be enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications. 4.
Considering the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits and demerits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the applicants on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-applicants shall be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid FIR provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Lower Court for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (YOGENDRA KUMAR PUROHIT),J 87-88-Arti/-
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.