MD KHALIQUE v. PERSONNEL AND ADMINIS REFORM
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-09. MD KHALIQUE v. PERSONNEL AND ADMINIS REFORM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 6384 of 2013 Md. Khalique .. … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa, Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. The Secretary, Board of Revenue, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 4. The Commissioner, North Chhotanagpur Division, Hazaribag. 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad-cum-Chairman, District Selection Committee, Dhanbad. ..... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kr. Verma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. O. P. Tiwari, G. P. -III ---------th 16/Dated: 9 December, 2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties through V. C. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for a direction upon the respondent no.
5 to consider the case of the petitioner for appointment on vacant Class-IV post, as he has been duly selected after written test as per the selection list/district panel dated 22. 04. 2006. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application may be disposed of in the light of order passed in the case of Satyavan Gope Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors in W. P. (S) No. 4887 of 2010 filed by a similarly situated person. He further submits that by the aforesaid order, the petitioner was directed to file a fresh representation taking all his pleas by annexing all relevant documents before the concerned respondents and the Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad was directed to take a decision. 4. Mr. O. P.
Tiwary, learned counsel for the respondent- State though opposed the prayer of the petitioner made in the instant writ application; however, fairly submits that if the petitioner files a fresh representation annexing all relevant documents/judgments; the same shall be considered in accordance with law, rules, regulations and policy decision of the Government. 5. In view of the limited submission of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ application is, hereby, disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation raising his grievance before the respondent no. 5 enclosing all documents/judgments in support of his claim within a period of eight weeks from today. If any such representation is filed before the respondent no. 5; the same shall be considered in accordance with law, rules, regulations and policy decision of the Government and a reasoned order be passed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 6.
With the aforesaid observations and directions the instant writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J. ) Amardeep/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.