BHANWAR SINGH S/O SH. SHER SINGH v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION
Court: High Court of Rajasthan
Bench: SAMEER JAIN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Rajasthan judgment dated 2024-12-12. BHANWAR SINGH S/O SH. SHER SINGH v. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
[2024:RJ-JP:51070] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13334/2022 Nawal Kishore Gupta Son Of Shri Gokul Chand Gupta, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of 19, Saket Colony, New Sanganer Road, Sodala, Jaipur At Present Posted Senior Teacher-Hindi, Government Higher Secondary School, Pahadia, Fagi, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Joint Director, School Education, Jaipur Region, Shiksha Sankul, J. l. n. Marg, Jaipur. 4. Chief District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Jaipur. 5. Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Pahadia, Phagi, District Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With 1. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15563/2015 2. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17953/2019 3. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9644/2021 4. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10551/2021 5. S. B.
Civil Writ Petition No. 14208/2021 6. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 203/2022 7. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10012/2022 8. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15559/2022 9. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15630/2022 10. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16208/2022 11. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17997/2022 12. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18559/2022 13. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19654/2022 14. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19666/2022 15. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19678/2022 16. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 182/2023 17. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 198/2023 18. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 209/2023 19. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 239/2023 20. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 292/2023 21. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 728/2023 22. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1717/2023 23. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2379/2023 24. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2422/2023 25. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2517/2023 26. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2775/2023 27. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No.
4032/2023 [2024:RJ-JP:51070] (2 of 3) [CW-13334/2022] 28. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4134/2023 29. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5991/2023 30. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15364/2023 31. S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15413/2023 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. P Saini Mr. Suray Prakash Sharma Mr. Gaurav Sharma Mr. Inder Raj Saini Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma Mr. Akshit Gupta Ms. Nisha Verma Mr. Akhil Simlote Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya Mr. Vijay Pathak Mr. Tribhuvan Narayan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. B. S Chhaba, AAG Mr. Shubhandu Pilania Mr. Rahul Gupta Mr. Kunal Kant Rawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 12/12/2024 1. On the directions of this Court the instant batch of petitions have been listed before the Court. Considering the akin controversy involved the instant petitions are adjudicated hereby this common judgment. It is made clear that the present judgment shall be applicable on mutatis mutandis basis on all the petitions connected herein. 2.
The present petitions have been filed assailing the impugned transfer orders and the consequential relieving orders. However, with efflux of time it can be assumed that much water has flown. 3. While placing reliance upon the ratio encapsulated in the case of Shilpi Bose & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar & ors. reported in 1991 Supp (2) SCC 659, this Court is of the view that the [2024:RJ-JP:51070] (3 of 3) [CW-13334/2022] Courts while entertaining the petitions pertaining to transfers have a limited jurisdiction. 4. Thence, this Court directs the petitioners/learned counsel appearing for the petitioners to submit a representation, enumerating their grievances and difficulties before the respondents, within a period of ten days from the date of passing of this order.
The respondents are directed to adjudicate the said representation filed by the petitioners within an upper limit of twenty days thereafter, by way of a speaking order, considering the administrative exigencies, governing policies and strictly in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, the instant batch of petitions are disposed of with aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /6 to 43 and C-1 except 7,10,16,22,37,40 and 42
Source: High Court of Rajasthan. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.