Skip to main content
LawSphereX

STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANOTHER v. ROLLY HONGAM AND 2 OTHERS

Court: High Court of Manipur

Bench: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-11-11. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANOTHER v. ROLLY HONGAM AND 2 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Digitally signed by SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL P a g e | 1 SHARMA SHARMA Date: 2024. 11. 13 13:27:32 +05'30' Item No. 66 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL MC(WA) No. 86 of 2024 The State of Manipur and Another Applicants Vs. Mr. Rolly Hongam and 2 Others Respondents BEFORE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE GOLMEI GAIPHULSHILLU KABUI ORDER 11. 11. 2024 Siddharth Mridul, C. J. : Mr. S. Niranjan, learned GA, appears on behalf of the applicants through video conferencing. The present application has been instituted on behalf of the State of Manipur praying as follows : “In the premises stated above, Your Lordships’ may be graciously pleased to consider the reasons given in the foregoing paras and circumstances stated therein as the sufficient cause for condoning the unintentional delay of 207 days only in filing the accompanying Writ Appeal and the same be heard on merit as the ends of justice may call for. ” Mr. N.

Biren, learned counsel; Mr. S. Kaminikumar Singh, learned CGC and Mr. BR Sharma, learned CGC, appearing on behalf of respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 respectively fairly do not oppose to the limited relief prayed for in the application. P a g e | 2 In view of the foregoing as well as the averments made in the application, we are of the view that applicants have been able to make out sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 207 (two hundred and seven) days in filing the accompanying appeal. Delay of 207 (two hundred and seven) days in filing the accompanying appeal is condoned. The application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is found to be in order and list the appeal for admission. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Sushil

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.