SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SMT MANJULA
Court: High Court of Karnataka
Bench: LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2025-04-24. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v. SMT MANJULA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4418 OF 2024 BETWEEN SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. , RD NO. 3/5, 3 FLOOR, S. V. ARCADE BILEKAHALLI MAIN ROAD, OFF: BANNERUGHATTA MAIN ROAD, IIM POST, BENGALURU REP. BY ITS MANAGER. …….. Appellant (By Sri: ANUP SEETHRAM RAO, Advocate) AND 1. SMT. MANJULA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS W/O NANJUNDAPPA D/O SRI. MURARAPPA 2. SRI. NANJUNDAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS S/O SRI GANGAPPA 3. MS. RASHMITHA N AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS D/O NANJUNDAPPA ALL ARE RESIDING AT ALKAPURA VILLAGE GAURIBIDANUR TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT. MFA. No. 4418/2024 2 -------------------------- 4. SRI. RAJESH M MAJOR IN AGE S/O SRI. MARIMUTHU RESIDING AT NO. 5/197 MIDDLE STREET, T. SUPPAIYAPURAM KULASHEKARAMANGALAM SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI TAMILNADU STATE (RC OWNER OF LORRY NO. TN-52-H-6366) 5. SRI. LAKSHMANA MAJOR IN AGE S/O SRI MUNEERAPPA RESIDENT OF WARD NO.
25, ELEPETE CHIKKABALLAPURA TOWN AND DISTRICT (RC OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE NO. KA-51-EC-6498) ……Respondents (BY SRI. K. L. SRIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 04. 04. 2024 passed in M. V. C. No. 5884/2022 on the file of the VIII ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU awarding compensation of Rs. 6,49,000/- with interest at 6 per cent P. A. from the date of petition till its realization. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: MFA. No. 4418/2024 3 -------------------------- ORAL ORDER As per the postal shara, notice to respondent No. 4 is returned as ‘unclaimed’ which amounts to deemed service of notice. One week time is granted to take steps in respect of respondent No. 5 and by that time, if the steps are not taken, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt. 24.
04. 2025, the office objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- [[[[[[[[[[[[[ ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : BR R By : YL C By : AR
Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.