JAHAR DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-18. JAHAR DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010147282020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/2030/2020 JAHAR DAS S/O. MUKUND DAS, R/O. VILL. GHILAGURI PART-III, P. O. GHILLAGURI, P. S. ABHAYAPURI, DIST. BONGAIGAON, PIN-783883, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FISHERY DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM 2:THE ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN VIP ROAD SIXMILE CHACHAL BORBARI GUWAHATI-781036 3:MANAGING DIRECTOR THE ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. VIP ROAD SIXMILE CHACHAL BORBARI GUWAHATI-781036 4:THE PROJECT MANAGER ASSAM FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOWER ASSAM ZONAL OFFICE ABHAYAPURI BONGAIGAON ASSAM 5:UTTAM KUMAR DAS S/O LT. BHUBEN DAS VILL. KACHUTIOLA Page No. # 2/3 P. S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON PIN-783371 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS.
M BHATTACHARJEE Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : --18. 12. 2020 Heard Ms. K. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Sri J. Das, learned counsel for the respondent no. 6, Ms. D. Das, learned counsel for AFDC and Ms. M. Das, learned counsel for respondent no. 5. By this I. A, certain correction are sought to be made which has been stated in paragraph 4. For ready reference, paragraph 4 is extracted herein below: (i) In para 5 (vii) at page no. 11 in place of “petitioner” may be corrected as “Respondent” No. 5, in line 1, 6, 8 and 9. (ii) In para 5 (V) at page no. 12, the date 29. 08. 2018 may be corrected as 28. 09. 2018 in line 1 and 6. The correction appeared to be trivial in nature, which has not been objected to by the learned counsel for the respondent. Accordingly, I. A is allowed and the applicant petitioner is permitted to make correction as specified in paragraph 4 of the I. A . I. A.
stands disposed of. JUDGE Page No. # 3/3 Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.