Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MANSHARAM v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-02-02. MANSHARAM v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VISHAL MISHRA nd ON THE 2 OF FEBRUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 2245 of 2024 BETWEEN:- 1. MANSHARAM S/O LATE BHADRU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCCUPATION: FAMRER CAST GOND R/O LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARA DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. SARASWATI BAI W/O LATE GHANSHYAM, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE CASTE GOND R/O LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARA DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. NIRMALA D/O LATE GHANSHYAM, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CASTE GOND R/O LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWARA DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI SHISHIR KUMAR SONI - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VALLABH BHAWAN BHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. COLLECTOR BALAGHAT DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. UPPER COLLECTOR BAIHAR TEHSIL BAIHAR DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH) 4.

SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (REVENUE) BAIHAR TEHSIL BAIHAR DISTRICT BALAGHAT (MADHYA PRADESH) 5. MANISHA D/O JAISRAM CASTE MAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWAR Signature Not Verified Signed by: LORETTA RAJ Signing time: 2/3/2024 11:26:40 AM DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) 6. MANISHA D/O JAISWAM OCCUPATION: CASTE MAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) 7. TAPASYA D/O JAISRAM OCCUPATION: CASTE MAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) 8. TAMANNA D/O JAISRAM OCCUPATION: CASTE MAHAR R/O VILLAGE LEELAMETA TEHSIL PARASWAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) 9. KANHAIYALA S/O TATU MARAR R/O VILLAGE PANDI TEHSIL BAIHAR DISTRICT (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (SHRI VED PRAKASH TIWARI - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENTS NOS.

1 TO 4) This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the following: ORDER After arguing at length counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this petition with liberty to approach the civil court for redressal of his grievance. Prayer allowed. The petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (VISHAL MISHRA) JUDGE LR Signature Not Verified Signed by: LORETTA RAJ Signing time: 2/3/2024 11:26:40 AM

Source: High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.