Skip to main content
LawSphereX

SMT. G HONNAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Court: High Court of Karnataka

Bench: E.S.INDIRESH

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Karnataka judgment dated 2024-12-20. SMT. G HONNAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

- 1 - WP No. 34706 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU TH DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 34706 OF 2024 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. G. HONNAMMA W/O. LATE B. H. MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. MS. INDIRA JYOTHI B. M. D/O. LATE B. H. MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, 3. PADMARJUNA B. M. S/O. LATE B. H. MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 7032, SOBHA RUBY, RD 3 FLOOR, SOBHA APARTMENTS, Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND TH 7 BLOCK, NAGASANDRA, CHAYA Location: High Court BENGALURU -560 073. of Karnataka …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARAN N. MAJAGE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560 001. - 2 - WP No. 34706 of 2024 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, KHANIJA BHAVANA, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. 3.

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO. 39, BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING, TH 4 FLOOR, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU -560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVINDRANATH B. , AGA FOR R1; SRI. H. L. PRADEEP KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3) THIS W. P. IS FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE GENERAL AWARD BEARING NO. KIADB/BHUSWA-2/2425/2021-22 DATED 30. 08. 2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY. NO. 3/2B MEASURING 3 ACRES 31 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT BARGENAHALLI VILLAGE, SOMPURA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, INSOFAR AS THE PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED WHICH ARE PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-F; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - WP No. 34706 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E. S. INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2.

The grievance of the petitioners is that the land belonging to the petitioners has been acquired by the respondent -KIADB for the purpose of industrial area and the petitioners are seeking quashing of the impugned Award dated 30. 08. 2021 (Annexure-F), inter alia, sought for a direction to the respondent - KIADB to pass the consent award under Section 29(2) of the KIAD Act. 3. In that view of the matter, accepting the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into consideration catena of decisions rendered by this Court in identical circumstances, I pass the following: O R D E R 1) Writ Petition is allowed; 2) Genera Award dated 30. 08. 2021 passed by the respondent - SLAO in respect of the land - 4 - WP No. 34706 of 2024 of the petitioners herein are concerned, is hereby quashed; 3) Respondent No.

2-Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board is directed to consider the case of the petitioners in terms of Section 29(2) of the KIAD Act upon the petitioners satisfying all the requirements thereof; 4) In the event of there being any adverse claim with regard to subject land belonging to the petitioners prior to the disbursal of the amount, the General Award will be revived automatically; 5) Respondent No. 2-Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board is directed to withdraw the amount in deposit before the competent Court, if any, and disburse to the petitioners in terms of the observation made above in accordance with law. SD/- (E. S. INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No. : 1 Sl No. : 30

Source: High Court of Karnataka. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.