M.Padmavathi v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-21. M.Padmavathi v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION NO: 2000 OF 2020 Between: M. Padmavathi, W/o. N. Vijaya Bhaskar, Aged 55 years, Assistant Secretary, Finance Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ... pETlTlONER AND State of Telangana, Represented by its Secretary (lF), Finance (OP. 1) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. ,..
RES'ONDENT Petition under Article 226 ol the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to declare the action of the Respondent in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 01/1 112016 for grant of Automatic Advancement scheme from 26tO512O16 on completion of 12 years of service and also representation dated ollogl2olg for stepping up of her pay on par with her Junior as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of lvlandamus and consequently direct the Respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 1/1 112016 for grant of Automatic Advancement ,from 26105t2016 0n completion of 12 yearc of service and also scheme representation dated 01/03/2019 for stepping up of her pay on par with her Junior, Mr. V. Srihari.
lA NO: 'l OF 2020 Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 01t1112016and0,1/03/20lgpendingdisposaloftheabovewritpetition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. RAMA SUBBA RAO Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - l The Court made the following: ORDER I{ON' BI-E SRI . I I]S'I'ICE ABII I NAN D KIJ M AIT SI IAV I I, I W. P. No. 2000 of 2020 ORDEII. : This Writ Petition is tlled seeking a Writ ol Mandarnus declaring the action ol' the respondent ln not considclins thc representation of the petitioner dated 0l-ll-2016 lbr grant ol Automatic Advancement Scheme from 26-05-2016 on completion ol 12 years of service and also representation dt. 0l-03-2019 lbr stepping up olher pay on par with herjunior as illegal and arbirrary. 2, I-leard Sri K. Rarna Subba Rao.
lcarucd counscl lirr the petitioner and the learned (lovernrnent Pleadcl litr Scrviccs-l appearing tbr thc rcsporrdent 3. lt has been contcnded by thc pctitioncr thar shc is worl<ing as Private S cc |etar1, to Sccrc'tary to thc Governnrent, i Finance Departrnent, Secretariat, I lyderabad and she is entitlecl lbr Aulomatic Advancernent Schernc- increrncnts on cornpletion o1'6 years aqd l2 years of service, but the respondcnts are not extending the said benefit to the petitioner and thal the petitioner has submittecl her representation on 0l-03-2019 rcqucstin{r the rcsponclcnts lbr sanction of6 years'and l2 years' increments on par with herjuniors. But so far the respondents have not passed any orders thcreon. Thelelbre, applopriatc or. ders bc passcd dir. eierii)q thc rcsponclolrt to consider her representation dt. 0 l-03-2019 in accordance with lcw. W. P No. 2000 ot2020 4. Learned Covernment pleadq. /trr. gs1.
y;qsr_I contends that -since the petirioner,s representation is pcnding consideration with the respondent. lhe respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders in accordance rvith law. 5. Ilaving rcgar. d to the subrnissions nrade by the parties, this (-'ourt is o1'the considered view that this writ petition can be clisposed o1' b,v directing the respondent to consider the represeittation dt. 01_03_20 I9 subnritred by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of eight rvccl<s fi otl the date ol'receipt of a copy of this order. 6 With these observations, the Writ petition is disposed oL No costs. 1 As a seclr:cl, the ntisce llaneous petitions pending, if any, shail stand closed. SD/-M. MANJULA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ': t-,/ SECTION OFFICER \ To, 1. The Secretary (lF), Finance (OP. 1) Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. One CC to Sri K. Rama Subba Rao, Advocate tOpUCl 3.
Two CCs to GP for Services-|, High Court for ttie Stat6 of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies CHR HIGH COURT 11212020 DATED:21 SIA 1 HE t o ! ) 11 z JAU 20e1 a ORDER * * Pl\'l- C H of 2020 W. P. No. 2000 WRIT PETITION DISPOSING OF THE WITHOUT COSTS ol w)
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.