B. Srinivas v. The Union of India
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-02-19. B. Srinivas v. The Union of India. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) N/ONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT . THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 3647 OF 2024 Between: B. Srinivas, S/o. B. V. Sundara Rao, aged about 55 years, Occ: Private Employee, r/o- Flat No. 505, lndira Arcade, W Nagar, Habsiguda, Hyderabad - 500 007. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Union of lndia, rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Telecommunications Department, Sancharbhavan, Ashoka road,New Delhi-1 10001 . 2 The Prl. Controller of Communication Accounts, Department of Telecommunications, 2nd Floor, CTO Building, Fort, MUMBAI - 400 001. Maharastra State. 3, The Accounts Officer, Pension Division, c/o. Principle CCA, Central Civil Servrces, Telangana Circle, Kavadiguda, Hyderabad. ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the in action of the Respondents 2 herein is not to initiating the action agarnst representation made by the petitioner daled 29. 11. 2O23 consequently to consider and direct the Respondents herein to sanction the pension to the petationer's elder brother B. Siva Prasad who is a 84o/o mentally disabled person and to appoint as a legal guardian to looking the welfare of the petitioner's elder brother by name B- Siva Prasad herein is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law by issuing a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate order or drrections to consider the representations, physically and mentally disabled petrtioner's elder brother by name B. Siva Prasad consequently direct the Respondents herein to appoint the petitioner as a legal guardian of his elder brother by name B.
Siva Prasad and to release the pension to the petitioner on behalf of the petitioner's elder brother by name B. Siva Prasad as per the CCA Rules 50(9)(h)(iv) rule 21 of CCA Rules 1972. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to consider the representations made by the petitioner daled 29. 11. 2023 and the 2nd Respondent herein has received the same on 09. 12. 2023 at the earliest otherwise that the petitioner's elder brother B. Siva Prasad will be put to a great loss and hardship and to pass an appropriate orders of the petitioner's representation. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K. ARVIND KUMAR, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA KARTHIK 1VRIT PETITION No.
3647 OF 2o24 ORDER: l,earned counsel for the petitioner has sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to approach appropriate forum. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn u,ith the liberty as sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K. SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT R GISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION FFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI DANTU VENKATA RAIVANA SARMA, Advocate TOPUC]- Z. One CC to SRt K ARVIND KUMAR, Central Govemment Counsel [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies BN GJP c\tp HlGH COURT PK,J DATED:1 910212024 ORDER 1HE SI4 t WP. No. 3647 of 2024 o 0 6 ApB 1' Z0zt Ct A . \\ t * o SsrarcuEo- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS e,{il,. '
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.