Skip to main content
LawSphereX

MS. VATSALA PANGHAL v. SMTI. SARITA YADAV, IAS AND ANR

Court: Gauhati High Court

Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA

Judgment date:

Case summary

Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2025-08-18. MS. VATSALA PANGHAL v. SMTI. SARITA YADAV, IAS AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

Page No. # 1/2 GAHC020005222025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : COP(C)/19/2025 MS. VATSALA PANGHAL D/O COLONEL LOVELESH PANGHAL, 1 NAGALAND BN NCC, KRUOLIEZOU COLONY, NEAR PENIEL CHURCH, BILLY GRAHAM ROAD, KOHIMA NAGALAND VERSUS SMTI. SARITA YADAV, IAS AND ANR THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, DEPT. OF HIGHER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, NAGALAND KOHIMA-797001 2:ER. VIPULHOU LHOUNGU THE DIRECTOR DEPT. OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION NAGALAND KOHIM Advocate for the Petitioner : C. T. JAMIR, SR. ADV, O TEMJEN JAMIR,JAWAMONG YADEN,IMTILA PONGEN,NUNGSANG AIER,KROVI TSUKRU,TOSHI JAMIR,ASA RUTSA,ALIBA OZUKUM,I IMCHEN Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No. # 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 19. 08. 2025 1. Heard Mr. C. T. Jamir, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. I. Imchen, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. V.

Soukhrie, the learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland, appearing through Video Conferencing. Mr. Imti Imsong, the learned Government Advocate, Nagaland is present in person. Also heard Mr. N. Angami, the learned Senior Government Counsel as well as Ms. S. Mere, the learned Government Counsel for the contemnors. 2. It is submitted by the learned Additional Advocate General that in the appeal preferred by the State respondents, i. e. , Writ Appeal No. 260/2025, the Appellate Court has stayed the operation of the order passed in the writ petition by this Court, in respect of which this contempt petition was filed. 3. It is submitted at the bar that in view of the stay granted by the Appellate Court, this contempt case is liable to be closed. 4. Accordingly, this contempt case is closed. Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.