Ahmed Hussain, v. C.G. Veera Prakash,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: G.RADHA RANI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-01-04. Ahmed Hussain, v. C.G. Veera Prakash,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ 321s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI SECOND APPEAL NO:1424 OF 2010 Appeal filed Llnder Section 100 of C. P. C. , aggrieved by the Judgment and decree dated 20. 10. 2010 passed in A. S. No. 43 of 2009 on the file of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad confirmlng the Judgment and Decree dated 22. 12. 2008 passed in O. S. No. 1428 of 20O4 on the file of the ll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. Between: Ahmed Hussain, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob, Age: 61 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 1-8-441411, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. ... APPELLANT/ APPELLANT/OEFENDANT AND C. G. Veera Prakash, S/o. late Gopala Swamy, Age: 35 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 3-2-711 , Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT l. A. NO: 1OF 2011(SAMP. NO: 1623 0F 20111 Between: C. G. Veera Prakash, S/o.
late Gopala Swamy, Age:35 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 3-2-711 , Kachiguda, Hyderabad. ... PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT AND Ahmed Hussain, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob, Age: 61 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 1-8-441411 , Chikkadpally, Hyderabad. ... RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER / APPELLANT '151 Petition under Section of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate order dated 24. 12. 2010 in SAMP-No. 3080/2010 in SA. No. 142412010. Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri H. SUDHAKARA RAO (Not present) Counsel forthe Respondent : Sri M. MOHAN RAO The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI SECOND APPEAL No. I424 of 2010 JUDGMENT: This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-appellant-defendant against the judgment and decree dated 20. 10. 2010 passed in A. S. No. 43 of 2009 by the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Cour1, Hyderabad confirming the judgrner.
rt and decree dated22. 12. 2008 passed in O. S. No. 1428 of 2004 by the IT Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Cour-t, I{yderabad. 2. On 21 . 12. 2023 the matter was adjoumed to today at the request of iearned counsel for the appellant that she would argue the matter by the next date of adjournment. lt was also specificd that no further adjournments would be granted. But, today there is no representation by the learned counsel lor the appellant. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent present and reported that the matter would become infructuous. 4. Recording the said subn-rission and as the counsei for the appellant failed to argue the matter, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. As a seq uel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any shall stand closed. SD/. M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR I /iTRUE COPY// { SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. (with records, if any) 2.
The ll Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad. (with records, if any) 3. One CC to Sri. H. SUDHAKARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri [vl. MOHAN RAO, Advocate [OPUC] g 5. Two CD Copies Nih ,a. , . :: . HlGH COURT DATED:0410112024 JUDGMENT SA. No. 1424 of 2010 1tl E S14 R s o f U 0 4 ilAn 2024 z ( ) * i So4y6'uEo i I DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS I I I G)o{'' i I W
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Archive: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.