LawSphereX

Yeleti Ranadeep Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: T.MADHAVI DEVI

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-16. Yeleti Ranadeep Reddy v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 321s ] IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION N O: 38053 OF 2025 Between: 1 Yeleti Ranadeep Reddy, S/o.. RaI Reddl,Age . 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, - -' Fl/o. H. No. 4-29. Ramestiwarpaily 6iknoor'tvtantli, kiriareOOy Distric"t. 2 Kadarr. Prav_e_en_ Kumar, S/o... De^vaiah, Age 35 years, Occ. Army Dept. - -'" Rl/o. H. No. 4-35. Rameshwarpaily, Biknoor ' M-andat, XdmarebOy Districi 3 Yeleti Narayana Reddy.. S/o. Buchi Reddy,- Age . 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, ' -' FYo. H. No. 4-29l't . Ram6shwarpaily, Biknooi A. ilaiOat, kjmareddy Disirici. ' 4 Jillalla Reddy, S/o pedda Raji Reddy, Age . 35 years, gcc. Agricutture, ^Krushna RJo. H. No 4-2311 , Rameshwarpaily, Eiknoor Mandal, Kamareddy District. 5. Puttakokkulq Rqnlesh, S/o Rajaiah, Age . 35 years, Occ. Agriculture Labour, -- -' R/o. H. No.

4-22l2, Rameshwarpa tty, B ikioor Mahda t, f arniredJy-Oiiil. t_ 6. Nalla W/o.. Mahipat 9angamani, ! q! dy, Age 45 years, Occ. Agricutture, -' Fyo H. No. 4-08/2. Rameshwa rpaly, Biknoor NIandal, X'arnaibOOvbiitiici-'- 7. Nagarthi Sai Reddy. S/o. Ram_ Reddy, Age 51 years, Occ. Agriculture, --'-' -' F7o H. No. 4-9, Rameshwarpaily. Biknooi Maidat, t<amlareOdy biiirici- B Nagarthi Narender Reddy. S/o.. Ram Reddy. Age. 61 years, occ. Agricurture, '- -' R/o H. No. 4-611 , Rameshwarpally, Biknoor Manial, Karirareddy Oist. iZi. -- 9. Nagarthi Lingawa, S/o_ Veera f,eddy, Age 75 years, Occ. Agriculture, - -- - -' Rl/o. H. No. 4-6, Rameshwarpally, Biknodr Ma-ndal, Kamareddy District] 10. Yeleti Nandini, W/o. Late Venkat_Reddy, Age . 3g years, Occ. Agriculture, - - '- -' R/o. H. No. 4-211 . Rameshwarpally. Biknoor lMa-ndal, KahareOdy Distrti 1l. Asa mRajender, S/o Vrttal Age. 49 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rt/o. H. No. 3_ 139/3, Rameshwarpally, Biknoor lr/andal, Kamareddy District ...

PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Telangana, bV its principal panchayat Secretary, f9n Raj Llepartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The State of Telangana, Rep. by rts principal Secretary, Roads and Buildings Uepartment, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3 The District Collector, Kamareddy District at Kamareddy. j 4. The District R and B Officer (Executive Engineer), R an B Department, Kamareddy - 503 111 5. The District Panchayat Officer, Kamareddy, Kamaredcly )istrict 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Rameshwarpally Gram Pancl- ryat, Biknoor lrlandal, Kamareddy District. ... RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndi; praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the ligh Court may be pleased to pass an order or orders one in the nature of \\l :IT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction the respondents No. 4, 5 and 6 withor t any notice marked the road widening from Ward No. 8, H. No. 4-29 to H. No.

3-l I 3/3 towards Biknoor to Rajampet village and mandal village of Rameshwarpalll rnd Biknoor [Mandal in between for proposal road width from 20 feets to 36 fecls by the respondents No. 4, 5 and 6 marking for extension of the road width withc rt any notice or due process of law nor paid the compensation, on d1. 22. 11 2l 25 the respondents Rand B and Gram Panchayat marked as a road developnr rnt for laying a new road, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of na,i ral justice, violating Articles 14, 19(1)(S), 21 and 300-A of the constitulr,) r of lndia and to (l consequently direct the Respondents No. 4, 5 and . o stay all fu rther proceedings in the proposed road widening from Ward I o 8, H. No. 4-29 to H. No. 3-139/3 towards Biknoor to Rajampet village anrl mandal village of Rameshwarpally and Biknoor [Vlandal by the respondent No t. 5 and 6. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the .

rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High CoL r may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in the proposed road widen rrr from Ward No. 8, H. No. 4-29 to H. No. 3-139/3 towards Biknoor to Rajampet village and mandal village of Rameshwarpally and Biknoor Mandal by the respor lent No. 4, 5 and 6, pending disposal of the above writ petrtion. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K. BUCHI BABU Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 and 5: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4: GP FOR ROAD AND BUILDINGS Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: cP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No. 6: SRI K. PRADEEP REODY, SC FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF: ELANGANA AT ITYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADH,A VI DEVI WRIT PETITION No. 38O53 OF 20! ! DATE: 16. 12. 2o25 Between: Yeleti Ranadeep Reddy & 1O others ... Petitioner AND The State of Tclangana & 5 others ...

Respondents ORDER: . ,vrit In this pe tition, the petitioners are irr ,grieve<1 by the inaction of thc respondents No. 4, 5 & 6 in lol owing the due process of law in rvidening the road from 2O feet ro 36 fi:e t to'"vards Biknoor to Rajarnpel Village and Mandal of Ranr: ;hs,trrpall_v and Biknoor Mandal, as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Learned SLanding counsel appearing for ti ernr Panchayat has filed a copy of the written instructions r. r,r eived by him, according to which, the Gram panchayt has no in,, rlvement rn the road extension rvork and it is Roads & Buildings l) rpartment (R & B Departrnent) rvhich has to undertake extensiL) I of road work. Further, it is stated that R & B Department has not approached-the Gram Panchayat regarding this matter 3. Learned Government Pleader appearing for Roads & Buildings Department has filed copy of the written instructions received by him, wherein it is stated as under: "1.

The Roads & Building s Department has not carried out anA road-uidth markings, nor has ang portion of the petitioners' houses been identified or demarcated tuidening purposes. for 2. Due to the insufficient land utidth, the proposed ttuo lane road has not been fonnation undertaken in of the petitioners' houses. front 3. 1f is submitted that, in the euent of any improuement to uiden the road (for road safetg) and inuoluing demolition of any bttildings at the said location, the same shall be undertaken onlg after due process in accordance with follouing laut. " 4 - In view of the above, it is Roads & Bulldings Department which has to undertake road work. Since it is stated that they will follow due process of law in the event of rvidening of the road, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents to follow due process of law, in the event of widening of the road. There sha1l be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if rny, pending in this Writ Petition.

shall stand closed. SD/. I . SRINIVASA REDDY ASS ISTANT REGISTRAR . ,11 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1- The Principal Secretary, The State of Telangana, Panr: rayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Principal_Secretary, The State of Telangana, Roa,j ; and Buildings Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 3. The District Collector, Kamareddy District at Kamareddy 4. The District R and B Officer (Executive Engineer), R art B Department, Kamareddy - 503 111 5. The District Panchayat Officer, Kamareddy, Kamaredd I District 6. The Panchayat Secretary, Rameshwarpally Gram Panr;l ayat. Biknoor l\,4andal, Kamareddy District. 7. One CC to Sri K. Buchi Babu, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj Rural Development ligh Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 9. Two CC to The GP for Road and Buildinqs, Hiqh Court f rr the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUTI 10. Two CC to The GP for Revenue, High Court forthe Statr of Telangana, at HyderabadIOUTI I 1.

One CC to Sri K. Pradeep Reddy, SC for Grampanchal,r tloPUCl 12. Two CD Copies TJ o. BS HIGH COURT CC TODAY DATED:1611212025 q7,t rir t ORDER o t.. t -i I l ztfi I WP. No. 38053 of 2025 * * r) i. },qATC DISPOSING OF FTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ? -c &

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.