SMT LALI v. STATE OF HARYANA
Court: High Court of Punjab and Haryana
Bench: MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Punjab and Haryana judgment dated 2025-09-24. SMT LALI v. STATE OF HARYANA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARHCHANDIGARH (204) CRMCRM-M-37433-2025 Date of Decision:Date of Decision:- 24. 09. 2025 Smt. Lali ……Petitioner……Petitioner Versus State of HaryanaHaryana ……Respondent……Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAINALOK JAIN **** Present: Mr. Aditya Sanghi, Advocate andand Mr. Surender Singh, AdvocateMr. Surender Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. Ms. Swati Batra, Sr. DAG, Haryana. ***** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. The present second petition has been filed seeking grant ofpetition has been filed seeking grant ofpetition has been filed seeking grant of regular bail to theregular bail to the petitioner in FIR No. petitioner in FIR No. 0075 dated 26. 03.
2024 under under Sections 406, 498A, 304B read with Section 34 of IPC,406, 498A, 304B read with Section 34 of IPC,406, 498A, 304B read with Section 34 of IPC, registered at registered at Police StationPolice Station HSIIDC, Barhi, District Sonipat, HaryanaHSIIDC, Barhi, District Sonipat, Haryana. 2. Learned State counsel has filed custody certificate as wellLearned State counsel has filed custody certificate as well as as status reportstatus report by way of an affidavit of Mr. by way of an affidavit of Mr. Rishi Kant, HPS, Assistant Rishi Kant, HPS, Assistant Commissioner of Police, Ganaur, District Sonipat,Commissioner of Police, Ganaur, District Sonipat,Commissioner of Police, Ganaur, District Sonipat, on behalf of respondent-- State, which are taken on record. State, which are taken on record. 3.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitionerter arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitionerter arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition and wishes to withdraw the presentdoes not press the present petition and wishes to withdraw the presentdoes not press the present petition and wishes to withdraw the presentdoes not press the present petition and wishes to withdraw the present petition, at this stage. petition, at this stage. 4. In light of the above, without expressing any opinion on theIn light of the above, without expressing any opinion on theIn light of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the presentmerits of the case, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(ALOK JAIN) SeptemberSeptember 24, 2025 JUDGE manju Whether speaking/reasoned:Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
Source: High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.