Macha Samyuktha v. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., (SCCL)
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: PULLA KARTHIK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-01-09. Macha Samyuktha v. The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd., (SCCL). Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
[ 3301 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO: 10986 OF 2024 Between: Macha Samyuktha, Wo. Madi Venkateswarlu D/o. lilacha Laxmin atayana Aged about 3'1 years, Occ. Housewife R/o. H. No. 10-1 -2411 , Gandhi Nagar, Manuguru Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, T. S. ... PETITIONER AND 1 The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , (SCCL), Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, P. B. No. 1B, Khairatabad P. O. Hyderabad, T. S. -500004 2 The Director, (Personal Administration and Welfare) The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , (SCCL) Kothagudem Collieries, SCCL Head Office, Bhadradri Kothagudem District - 507101 3. The General lManager, SCCL Manuguru Area, Bhadradri Kothagudem District - 507117 ...
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more partrcularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in appointing the petitioner on compassionate grounds is illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14,1 6 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondents to provide suitable job to the petitioner in the respondent No. 1's company on compassionate grounds by considering the representations of the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to provide suitable job to the petitioner in the respondent No.
1's company on compassionate grounds by considering the representations of the petitioner, otherwrse lwould suffer serious hardship and irreparable loss. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DORNALA SAI MAHITHA Counsel for the Respondents: SRI P. SRI HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL The Court made the following: ORDER TN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{ARTHIK 6 WRIT PETITION No. 1O986 OF 2024 DATE OF ORDER : O9. OL. 2O26 Between: N4acha Samlruktha, W/o. Madi Venkateswarlu. { ... Petitione r AND The Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. , (SCCL), Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Bhavan, Red Hills, P. B. No. 18, Khairatabad P. O. Hyderabad, T. S. 500 004 and 2 others. - ..
Respondents :IORDER:: Whe n the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Dornala Sai Mahitha, learnecl counsel appearir-rg for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition u,ith liberty to avail appropriate iegal remedies as available under law. 2. Permission is accorded. . , 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrau,n, r,r,itl-r liberty as prayed for. N4isccllancous petitions, if any, pending sha-ll stand closed. There sha11 be no order as to costs. SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL EPUTY REGIS //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, 'I . One CC to SRI DORNALA SAt IVAH|THA, Advo e PUC] 2. One CC to SR r p. sRt HARSHA REDDY, SC FOR SCCL [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies BSR Y HIGH COURT DATED: 09/01 12026 IIIE S i:. -kr (, f o :) :f. 2 3 r[8 21. 12fi ORDER * * WP. No. 10986 of 2024 D4ra1r"1 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS @ qtJ e,h &
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.