Shaik Sathar v. The State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

Judgment date: 2026-04-24

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-24. Shaik Sathar v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

131E3 l IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION N O: 12989 OF 2026 Between: '1. Shaik Sathar, S/o Shaik Khasim Aged about 66 years, agriculture 2. shaik Jilani, S/o shaik Khasim Aged about 56 years, agricurture v Both are residents of Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ... PETITIONERS AND 1. The state of rerangana, Rep. by principar its secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Kongar Kalan, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District 4. The Tahsildar, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents in taking action pursuant to petitioners Bhu Bharathi Applications dated 1s-o4-2026 vide Application No. c12600012273 and c1260oo12275 seeking blocking in Bhu Bharathi web portal with regard petitioners agricultural land in sy. No. 139A and 139AA an extent ot Ac. 12-34 Gts. situated in Siddapur village, Kothur Mandar, Ranga Reddy Districtas being iflegar and arbikary and consequently direct respondents to take action pursuant to pettioners Bhu Bharathi Applications dated 15-04-2026 vide Apptication No. ct2600012213 and c|'2600o12275 seeking blocking in Bhu Bharathi web portal with regard to petitioners agricultural land in Sy. No. 139A and 139AA an extent of Ac. 12-34 Gts.

situated in Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districtand to pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. l. A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents to block transaction in Bhu Bharathi Portal with regard to petitioners agricultural land in Sy. No. 139A and 139AA an extent of Ac. 12-34 Gts. situated in Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy basing on petitioners Bhu Bharathi Applications dated 15-04-2026 vide Application No. C\26OOO12273 and C126O0012275 pending disposal of writ petition and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI R. R. KALYAN Counsel for the Respondents: ASST. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.

12989 OF 2026 DATE OF ORDER: 24. M. 2O26 Between: Shaik Sathar and another Petitioners AND The State of Telangana Represented by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department, Secretariat. Hyderabad and others. . . . Respondents ORDER: (ORAL) Heard R. R. Kalyan, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. L. Ravinder' leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue' appearing lor the respondents; and perused the material on record 2. Leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader fbr Revenue takes preliminary objection to the maintainability of the writ petition and submitted that the petitioners' Bhu Bharati application Nos. CI2600012273 and C12600012275 dated 15. 04. 2026 for blocking the land admeasuring Acs. t2-34 guntas in Survey Nos. l39A and 139AA, situated at Siddapur Village, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, from transactions cannot be cntertained by the respondent authorities unless there is injunction order passed by the Civil Court. The I petitioners instituted two suits i. e. O. S. No.

24 ol 2021 before the leamed Principal District Judge, Mahabubnagar and O. S. No. IO if ZOZZ before the Iearned Junior Cir:il Judge, Mahabubnagar, and admiftedly. no injunction was passed in the suits. 3. Leamcd counsel lor the petitioners submitted that the applications filed by the pctitioners are pending for adjudication advantage ol the same, the respondent authorities are trying to create interest over the subject land. As such, the petitioners filed application Nos. CI2600012273 and CI26O00\2Z75 daaed blocking thc land fiom transactions. 4. In the circuinstances, without expressing any opinion on merits. petition is disposed oL lJowever, in the interests ofjustice. the directed to dispose of thc injunction applications filed by the O. S. No. 24 ol 2021 and O. S. No. l0 of ZO22 as expeditiously preferably. u,ithin a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. l'hcre shall bc no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending petition, stand closed sD/- KV. O //TRUE COPY// /{LI '\,=",, \ I t,a_/ To, 1 The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector, Kongar Kalan, Ranga Reddy District. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District 4. The Tahsildar, Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District . # w Advocate' 5. One CC to SRI R. R. KALYAN, [OPUCI at REVENUE High Court for thb State of Telangana, 6. Two CCs to GP FoR Hyderabad [OUTI 7. Two CD CoPies. \ BSK a , I HIGH COURT DATED: 2410412026 CC TODAY t ( . -\-r-- . . .. - . - v,^tii. \i\- I r":. \\- \-\''' 'o^':\ j'- . )'). -) i. , _) t- 'i 30 APB 20? 0 i i',i i '. ,. ' ,,. . -'. ',Jl r:,-,'/ J- ,',/', -.. ,-. ORDER WP. No. 12989 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS &6 ov

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.