YOOSUF v. STATE OF KERALA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-22. YOOSUF v. STATE OF KERALA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P. V. ASHA TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 1ST POUSHA, 1942 WP(C). No. 29013 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: YOOSUF, AGED 53 YEARS SON OF MUHAMMED, MANARIKKAL HOUSE, AMSHAM, MEPPADI, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676 306. BY ADVS. SRI. P. E. SAJAL SRI. S. KABEER RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695 001. 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM, COLLECTORATE, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM-676 305. 3 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BRIDGES SUB DIVISION, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM-676 121. 4 VILLAGE OFFICER, TIRURANGADI VILLAGE, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676 306. OTHER PRESENT: SMT. PRINCY XAVIER, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22. 12. 2020, ALONG WITH WP(C). 29023/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P. V.
ASHA TUESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 1ST POUSHA, 1942 WP(C). No. 29023 OF 2020 PETITIONER/S: 1 SAIDALAVI, AGED 55 YEARS, SON OF HASSAN HAJI, KADAVATH HOUSE, PANTHARANGADI, THRIKKULAM, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676306. 2 MOIDEENKUTTY, AGED 55 YEARS, SON OF HASSAN HAJI, KADAVATH HOUSE, PANTHARANGADI, THRIKKULAM, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676306. BY ADVS. SRI. P. E. SAJAL SRI. S. KABEER RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM-695001. 2 DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM, COLLECTORATE, UP HILL, MALAPPURAM-676305. 3 ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, BRIDGES SUB DIVISION, MANJERI, MALAPPURAM-676121. 4 VILLAGE OFFICER, TIRURANGADI VILLAGE, TIRURANGADI, MALAPPURAM-676306. OTHER PRESENT: SMT. PRINCY XAVIER, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22. 12. 2020, ALONG WITH WP(C).
29013/2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT nd Dated this the 22 day of December 2020 Petitioners in both these cases challenge the notices for eviction complaining that there is no clarity and it is not even stated which part of their buildings are re-vacated and what is the nature of encroachment. It is also stated that even the date on which the notices are issued is also not stated. Therefore, there shall be a direction to the Assistant Executive Engineer to hear the petitioners within a period of two weeks and to take fresh steps after hearing them. Petitioners shall cooperate with the said hearing. Till such time no coercive action shall be taken. The Writ Petitions are disposed of accordingly. Sd/- P. V. ASHA rkc JUDGE APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29013/2020 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 495/16 OF SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, TIRURANGADI. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TIRURANGADI DATED 16.
7. 2019. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED NIL. APPENDIX OF WP(C) 29023/2020 PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS: EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO. 1339/98 OF SUB REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, TIRURANGADI. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TIRURANGADI DATED 12. 4. 2019. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER DATED NIL.
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.