Skip to main content
LawSphereX

D.Tamilarasi v. The Tahsildar

Court: Madras High Court

Bench: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Judgment date:

Case summary

Madras High Court judgment dated 2026-04-28. D.Tamilarasi v. The Tahsildar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

WP No. 14784 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 14784 of 2026 D. Tamilarasi .. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Tahsildar Dharmapuri Taluk and District. 2. Taluk Surveyor Dharmapuri Taluk and District. 3. State represented by Inspector of Police, Mathikonpalayam Police Station, Dharmapuri Dt. .. Respondent(s) directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct the survey of the Property situate at Akkamanahalli Village, Dharmapuri Taluk, and District in S. No. 294 measuring 1. 05 Hectares and fix the boundaries for the same with the assistance of the 3rd Respondent by considering the online application made by the petitioner dated 05. 08. 2025 within a time which may be stipulated by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr. J. Bharathiraja For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Arumugam Govt. Advocate For R1 & R2 Mr. V. Meganathan Govt. Advocate For R3 __________ Page1 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No.

14784 of 2026 Order This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to respondents 1 and 2 to survey and demarcate the property, which according to the petitioner is owned by her, based on her online application dated 05. 08. 2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The petitioner had submitted her online application dated 05. 08. 2025 for the aforesaid purpose. Since the same has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3. Mr. S. Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 2. Mr. V. Meganathan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) accepts notice on behalf of the third respondent. 4. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s application. 5.

No prejudice will be caused to respondents 1 and 2 if the said authorities are directed to survey and demarcate the boundaries of the petitioner’s property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, after hearing the objections of the neighbouring land owners as well as any __________ Page2 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 14784 of 2026 other party whom respondents 1 and 2 deem it fit to enquire. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of in the following manner:- (a) Before surveying the lands in question, the first respondent is directed to issue notice to the neighbouring land owners and also to any other party, whom they deem it fit to put on notice.

(b) After receiving objections if any and after considering the same, the second respondent shall conduct survey and demarcate the boundaries of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. (c) If the need arises for police assistance and on a request made by the first respondent, the third respondent shall render police assistance for the effective implementation of this order. No Costs. 28-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VGA __________ Page3 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis WP No. 14784 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA To 1. The Tahsildar Dharmapuri Taluk and District. 2. Taluk Surveyor Dharmapuri Taluk and District. 3. State represented by Inspector of Police, Mathikonpalayam Police Station, Dharmapuri Dt. WP No. 14784 of 2026 28-04-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www. mhc. tn. gov. in/judis

Source: Madras High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.