SURENDER KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
Court: High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Himachal Pradesh judgment dated 2024-12-23. SURENDER KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER. Read the judgment and case...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 14088 of 2024 rd Decided on: 23 December, 2024 _________________________________________________________________ Surender Kumar Sharma and others .... Petitioners Versus State of H. P. & Anr. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioners: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L. N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L. N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2.
This writ petition has been filed for grant of following substantive relief: - “(i) That an appropriate writ, order or directions may kindly be issued and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the benefit of 14 years under new ACPS in favour of petitioners on and with effect from 2012 in case of petitioners no 1 to 5 and 2014 and 2015 in the case of Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 -petitioners No. 6 and 7, with all consequential benefits of pay arrears etc. alongwith interet @ 9% p. a. ” 3. Admittedly, the petitioners have invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation(s) to the competent authority for the redressal of their grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners would be preferring representation(s) within two weeks from today.
In case such a representation(s) is/are so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 23, 2024 R. Atal
Source: High Court of Himachal Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.