Waikhom Binodkumar Singh v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 5 ORS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2026-01-28. Waikhom Binodkumar Singh v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 5 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Digitally Lucy signed by Lucy Gurumayum Item Nos. 57 GurumDate: 2026. 01. 29 15:16:07 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR ayum +05'30' AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 262 of 2025 Waikhom Binodkumar Singh …Petitioner/s Vrs. State of Manipur & 5 Ors …Respondent/s -B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH 29. 01. 2026 Heard Mr. Rendy M, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner; and Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the respondent nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 & 6; also heard Mr. I. Lalitkumar, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. Khelemba, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 7; None appears on behalf of the respondent no. 4. The present writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing and setting aside the order dated 06. 12. 2024 issued by the Government of Manipur appointing the respondent no.
7 as Chairman, Board of Secondary Education Manipur (BOSEM) on deputation basis couple with a prayer for issuing a direction to consider the entire process of making appointment to the post of Chairman, BOSEM. Page 1 Mr. Th. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the respondents submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, Government of Manipur had issued an order dated 21. 11. 2025 reducing the term of deputation of the said respondent no. 7 and order his repatriation. The learned GA also submitted that by another order dated 21. 11. 2025, Shri N. G. Bhogendra Meetei, MCS who is holding the post of Director (Edn. ), Government of Manipur has been allowed to hold the post of chairman of BOSEM on deputation basis in addition to his existing post as Director (Edn. Schools). The learned GA submitted that in view of the subsequent development, no cause survives for adjudication in this writ petition and the present writ petition can be closed as infructuous.
In view of the submission made by the learned GA appearing for the respondents, this Court of the considered view that no cause survives for adjudication in this writ petition and accordingly the present writ petition is hereby closed as infructuous. JUDGE Lucy Page 2
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.