JALAJA C.P v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-03-26. JALAJA C.P v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
2025:KER:27130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. S. DIAS TH WEDNESDAY, THE 26 DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 18802 OF 2023 PETITIONERS: 1 JALAJA C. P AGED 73 YEARS W/O LATE K. S SIVAN KOTHARAM HOUSE POOSHARIPADY, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683513 2 ABILASH K. S AGED 40 YEARS S/O LATE K. S SIVAN, KOTHARAM HOUSE POOSHARIPADY, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683513 BY ADV BIJU ABRAHAM RESPONDENTS: 1 THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE ALUVA RURAL, ALUVA, PIN - 683101 2 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI- 682035 3 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER NORTH PARAVUR POLICE STATION, NORTH PARAVUR P. O. , PIN - 683520 4 APPUKUTTAN NAIR AGED 60 YEARS S/O DAMODOARAN, MACHAYATH, KIZHAKKEPRAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683520 5 SMT. SREEDEVI @ SREEKUTTY AGED 56 YEARS W/O APPUKUTTAN NAIR, MACHAYATH, KIZHAKKEPRAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683520 WP(C) No.
18802 of 2023 2 2025:KER:27130 6 SHIJITH AGED 24 YEARS S/O APPPUKKUTTAN NAIR, MACHAYATH, KIZHAKKEPRAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683520 7 ROHINI AGED 21 YEARS D/O APPUKKUTTAN NAIR, MACHAYATH, KIZHAKKEPRAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683520 BY ADVS. S. RAJEEV S V. VINAY(K/355/2009) M. S. ANEER(K/644/2013) PRERITH PHILIP JOSEPH(K/000736/2015) SARATH K. P. (K/001467/2021) ANILKUMAR C. R. (K/001190/2020) GP. SMT. VIDHYA KURIAKOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26. 03. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) No. 18802 of 2023 3 2025:KER:27130 JUDGMENT th Dated this the 26 day of March, 2025 st The writ petition is filed to direct the 1 respondent to afford adequate police protection to the life and property of the petitioners from the threats being caused by the party respondents. 2. When the writ petition came up for consideration on rd 05. 07.
2023, this Court had directed the 3 respondent to ensure that law and order is maintained in the petitioners locality from any threats being caused by the party respondents. 4. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel appearing for the party respondents. 5. On a consideration of the facts and the materials on record, particularly that the interim order is in force since 05. 07. 2023, I am of the view that a quietus can be given to the rd writ petition, by permitting the petitioners to approach the 3 respondent, in case if there is any threats from the part of the WP(C) No. 18802 of 2023 4 2025:KER:27130 rd party respondents. If such complaint is filed, the 3 respondent shall act upon the complaint, in accordance with law, without interfering in any civil dispute between the petitioners and the party respondents. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- C. S. DIAS, JUDGE AJ WP(C) No.
18802 of 2023 5 2025:KER:27130 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 18802/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DATED 03-05-2023 Exhibit P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT GIVEN TO THE 1ST PETITIONER BY THE NORTH PARAVUR POLICE DATED 04-05-2023 Exhibit P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE ELECTRICITY ENGINEER NORTH PARAVUR DATED 06-05-2023 Exhibit P4 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST & 2ND RESPONDENTS DATED 02-06-2023 Exhibit P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT COMPLAINT ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER FROM THE OFFICE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 02-06-2023
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.