M V PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Bench: SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Andhra Pradesh judgment dated 2025-01-30. M V PRASAD v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page 1 of 3 SRS,J W. P. No. 2249 of 2025 ` APHC010036012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3331] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2249/2025 Between: M V Prasad ... PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ... RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES IV The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri Parimi Rama Rayudu, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri S. Raju, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services–I for respondent No. 1 and Sri M. S. R. Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 to 4. 2. A show cause notice vide Rc. No. DWMA-SA/27/2024-OA(E3-EGS)- DWMANLR, dated 22. 08. 2024 (Ex. P1) was issued to the petitioner by respondent No. 3.
The petitioner submitted explanation and thereafter, personal hearing was conducted on 26. 11. 2024. Page 2 of 3 SRS,J W. P. No. 2249 of 2025 ` 3. Learned counsel for petitioner would submit that respondent No. 3 conducted inquiry in respect of some of the works on 26. 11. 2024 and in respect of other works, the inquiry was not completed so far. 4. Learned standing counsel for respondents 2 to 4, submitted the instructions of respondent No. 3, wherein it was mentioned that inquiry was completed on 26. 11. 2024 and appropriate orders will be passed within one week in accordance with Rules. 5. Thus as seen from the material on record there is no dispute regarding issuance of notice and conducting inquiry on 26. 11. 2024. The imputation in the notice is misappropriation of funds. It is not the case of the petitioner that no opportunity of hearing was afforded. The averment in the writ affidavit regarding works is not in consonance with the contents of the notice. 6.
Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of both the counsel, directing the learned respondent No. 4 to pass appropriate orders strictly in terms of the Field Assistants Human Resource Policy, 2013 qua the notice Ex P. 1. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 30. 01. 2025 IKN Page 3 of 3 SRS,J W. P. No. 2249 of 2025 ` THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2249/2025 Date : 30. 01. 2025 IKN
Source: High Court of Andhra Pradesh. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.