HEENA GAURAV BURNWAL ALIAS HEENA BURNAWAL ALIAS HEENA AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-12. HEENA GAURAV BURNWAL ALIAS HEENA BURNAWAL ALIAS HEENA AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7095 of 2025 ---- Heena Gaurav Burnwal @ Heena Burnawal @ Heena Agrawal, aged about 40 years, W/o Gaurav Kumar Burnwal, R/o Danvir Bhama Shah Dal, Koiribandh, Satmorwa, Jharia, PO and PS – Jharia, District - Dhanbad .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Fahad Allam, Advocate ---- 04/12. 12. 2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No. 254 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 318(4), 316(5), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 340(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh. 3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was deputed in Ramgarh Health Department as District Account Assistant on February, 2020 and on April 2020 the petitioner had gone on maternity leave. He further submits that during this period all the financial work including the payment of salary was conducted by then District Program Manager, Mr. Devendra Bhushan Srivastava and named accused Md. Amjad Hussain. He then submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner has received the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from Ramgarh --1-- A. B. A. No. 7095 of 2025 Police and has duly appeared before the Investigating Officer and has filed the detailed reply to the Police. He next submits that in spite of that the police are harassing and threatening her to arrest and that has been stated in paragraph No. 10 of the petition. 4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner was posted as District Account Assistant for some time. 5. It has been pointed out that since April 2020 the petitioner was on maternity leave and during that period payment of salary was done by the then District Program Manager and one named accused Md. Amzad Hussain and the petitioner has complied the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and in spite of that the police is harassing the petitioner. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh in connection with Ramgarh P. S. Case No. 254 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) Dated 12. 12. 2025 Sangam/ --2-- A. B. A. No. 7095 of 2025
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.