G.DEORGE PANICKER, v. THA DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2020-12-17. G.DEORGE PANICKER, v. THA DISTRICT COLLECTOR,. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020 / 26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1942 RP. No. 967 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 25234/2020 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 25234/2020(D) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18. 11. 2020 REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER: G. GEORGE PANICKER, AGED 84 YEARS, S/O. GHEEVARGHESE PANICKER, ARAPPURA PUTHEN VEEDU, PERUMBPUZHA, KUNDARA P. O. , KOLLAM DISTRICT 691 501. BY ADV. SRI. SAJU J PANICKER RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC: 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION P. O. , KOLLAM 691 013. 2 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CIVIL STATION P. O. , KOLLAM-691 013. 3 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND RECORDS) TALUK CUTCHERRY, KOLLAM 691 001. 4 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ELAMPALLOOR VILLAGE, ELAMPALLOOR, KOLLAM- 691 501. 5 THE SECRETARY ELAMPALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ELAMPALOOR, KOLLAM 691 501. 6 THE TALUK SURVEYOR, TALUK OFFICE, KOLLAM 691 001. 7 GEEVARGHESE Y. AGED 60, S/O.
YOHANNAN, PUTHENVILA VADKKETHIL, CHANGAYI MURI, PERUMPUZHA P. O. , KOLLAM 601 504. SRI M R SASITH, SC SRI K P HARISH, SR GP THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17. 12. 2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: RP. No. 967 OF 2020 IN WP(C). 25234/2020 2 ORDER This review petition is filed seeking to review the judgment dated 18. 11. 2020 in W. P. (C) No. 25234 of 2020. 2. I have heard Sri. Saju J Panicker, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader. 3. It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that pursuant to directions issued by this Court in the above judgment, the Tahsildar (Land Records) will take up Ext. P2 application dated 28. 10. 2020 submitted by the petitioner and take a decision. It is submitted that till orders are passed, on the said application all further proceedings pursuant to the report dated 29. 9. 2020 produced as Ext. P5 in the writ petition shall be kept in abeyance.
In view of the said submission, the petitioner cannot be stated to have any further grievance. This review petition is closed. SD/- RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V JUDGE DSV //TRUE COPY// P. A. TO JUDGE
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.