AISWARYA P. RAVEENDRAN v. VISHNU KRISHNA
Court: High Court of Kerala
Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2024-07-31. AISWARYA P. RAVEENDRAN v. VISHNU KRISHNA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM ST WEDNESDAY, THE 31 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 TR. P(C) NO. 460 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP NO. 277 OF 2024 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: AISWARYA P. RAVEENDRAN AGED 26 YEARS D/O P. N. RAVEENDRAN, PDIKKAKUDIYIL HOUSE, VETTIMUKAL . P. O. , KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686631 BY ADV A. K. HARIDAS RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: VISHNU KRISHNA AGED 30 YEARS S/O KRISHNADAS T. , KADAKAMPALLIL HOUSE,CHERIYANAD P. O. , CHEGANOOR-, PIN - 689511 THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31. 07. 2024, ALONG WITH Tr. P(C). 461/2024, 468/2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 2 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM ST WEDNESDAY, THE 31 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 TR. P(C) NO. 461 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP NO.
36 OF 2024 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: AISWARYA P. RAVEENDRAN AGED 26 YEARS D/O P. N. RAVEENDRAN, PDIKKAKUDIYIL HOUSE, VETTIMUKAL . P. O. , KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686631 BY ADV A. K. HARIDAS RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: VISHNU KRISHNA AGED 30 YEARS S/O KRISHNADAS T. , KADAKAMPALLIL HOUSE,CHERIYANAD P. O. , CHEGANOOR, PIN - 689511 THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31. 07. 2024, ALONG WITH Tr. P(C) NOS. 460/2024 AND 468/2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 3 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM ST WEDNESDAY, THE 31 DAY OF JULY 2024 / 9TH SRAVANA, 1946 TR. P(C) NO. 468 OF 2024 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN OP(OTHERS) NO. 314 OF 2024 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS: 1 AISWARYA P. RAVEENDRAN AGED 26 YEARS D/O P. N. RAVEENDRAN, PDIKKAKUDIYIL HOUSE, VETTIMUKAL . P. O.
, KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686631 2 P. N. RAVEENDRAN , PADIKKAKUDIYIL HOUSE, VETTIMUKAL . P. O. , KOTTAYAM TALUK, KOTTAYAM, PIN - 686631 BY ADV A. K. HARIDAS RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: VISHNU KRISHNA AGED 30 YEARS S/O KRISHNADAS T. , KADAKAMPALLIL HOUSE,CHERIYANAD P. O. , CHEGANOOR, PIN - 689511 THIS TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 31. 07. 2024, ALONG WITH Tr. P(C) NOS. 460/2024 AND 461/2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 4 : VIJU ABRAHAM , J. =========================== Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 ============================ st Dated this the 31 day of July, 2024 ORDER Tr. P(C) No. 460 of 2024 is filed seeking transfer of OP No. 277/2024 filed by the respondent seeking dissolution of marriage, whereas in Tr. P(C) No. 461 of 2024 petitioner seeks transfer of OP No. 36 of 2024, a petition filed by the petitioner seeking recovery of money, and Tr. P(C) No.
468 of 2024 is filed seeking transfer of OP (Others) No. 314 of 2024 which is a suit for money filed by the respondent against the petitioner and her father, all pending before the Family Court, Mavelikkara. Petitioner seeks for transfer of the same to Family Court, Kottayam at Ettumanoor. 2. The specific contention of the petitioner is that she is residing very near to the Family Court, Ettumanoor, and she is finding it difficult to travel all the way to Family Court at Mavelikkara for contest of the cases. 3. Though notice was issued to the respondent in all these transfer petitions there is no appearance on his behalf. 4. Admittedly petitioner is residing very near to the Family Court, Ettumanoor and she is finding it difficult to travel all the way to Family Court, Mavelikkara for conducting the cases. Taking into Tr. P(C) Nos.
460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 5 : consideration the settled law that the convenience of the wife is of paramount importance while considering an application for transfer of the case as held by the Apex Court in Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay and another, AIR 2002 SC 396, Mangla Patil Kale v. Sanjeev Kumar Kale, (2003) 10 SCC 280, Aishwarya v. Saravana Karthik Sha, 2022 (4) KLT OnLine 1020 (SC) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi v. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi, 2005 (1) KLT OnLine 1169(SC), I am inclined to pass an order transferring O. P. Nos. 277, 36 & 314 of 2024 on the file of the Family Court, Mavelikkara to the Family Court, Kottayam at Ettumanoor for trial and disposal. Transfer petitions (Civil) are allowed as above. Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sbk/- Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 6 : PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE O. P. 36/24 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 7 : PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE O. P.
(OTHERS) 314/24 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA Tr. P(C) Nos. 460, 461 & 468 of 2024 : 8 : PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ABOVE O. P. 277/24 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKARA
Source: High Court of Kerala. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.