MANSHI LAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2025-12-12. MANSHI LAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7078 of 2025 Manshi Lal, aged about 27 years, daughter of Shilwant Lal @ Shiwant Lal, st nd resident of Sai City Apartment 1 Phase, 2 Floor, Ramnagar, P. O. Hazaribagh, P. S. Kadma, District-Hazaribagh (Jharkhand) ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . …. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A. P. P. 04/ 12. 12. 2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sadar P. S. Case No. 468 of 2025, registered under sections 189 (4), 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 316(2), 318(4), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 324(4), 140(3) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class at Ranchi. 3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is running a private hospital in which for development work of said hospital contract was provided to Kunal Agarwal and Kunal Agarwal has taken certain money from the informant side and informant has come in the hospital for demand of money from Kunal Agarwal and they have also mishandled the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner was about to lodge complaint but in the meantime the informant has lodged the present false case against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 12 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegation of damaging the car is there against three accused persons. 5.
Considering that the petitioner is running a private hospital and it has been pointed out that for demand of money from Kunal Agarwal, the informant come to the hospital along with other and petitioner was mishandled 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class at Ranchi, in connection with Sadar P. S. Case No. 468 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B. N. S. S, 2023. Dt. 12. 12. 2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J. ) satyarthi-
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.