GUNDEPUDI RAMULU v. D.SANJEEVA REDDY AND ANR
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: P.SREE SUDHA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-04-22. GUNDEPUDI RAMULU v. D.SANJEEVA REDDY AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
[ ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD OF APRIL TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY FIVE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA S APPEAL NO ? 420F 2011 MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MI SCELLANEOU judgment M'V against the and decree Appeal filed under Section 173 of Act dated01. 12. 2010inM. V. o'P. No. ,4T4of2006onthefileoftheCourtofthe ChairmanMotorAccidentClaimsTribunal_cum-lVAdditionalDistrict(llFTC) Nalgonda. Between: Village, Lorry cleaner R/o. Raingudem Gundeoudi Ramulu, s/o. Bixamaiah Thiparthy Mandal, Nalgonda District' ... AppellanUClaimant AND Owner of Lorry 1 n s2nieeva Reddv. S/o. Gopal Reddy. Aged Major Business' ;. ;;i;';"r. 6. Ai;ii unzis Cl c. trrls. ssri da laji L6 rry s u p plv ofrice' B Eside f\Iandal' Huzarnagar Village and IJilv'rj*""iJnisoiiationt, Ltd, Vide Police No 620T003l/04106629 2 The New lndia Assurance Co O/o. sudarshan Complex, Patamata, Vijayawada' ResPondents/ResPondents '.. SRl.
P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Appellant: No'1: None Appeared Counsel forthe Respondent R K SURI Counsel for the RespondentNo'2: JUDGEMENT The Court made the following: -. ;:. :er::"-Y THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA M. A. C. M. A. No. 42 of 2O11 JUDGMENT: This appear is fiied against the order dated o 1. 12. 2010 in O. P. No. 474 of 2O06 passed by the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (iV Additional District Judge, II F,T. C. ) at Nalgonda. 2. The appellant/petitioner Iiled O. p. No. 4 74 of 2006, claiming compensation of Rs. 1,00,00 O/_ for injuries sustained by the petitioner. in the road traffic accident occurred on 23. 06. 2005. 3. Learned counsel for appellant/petitioner stated that on behalf of the petitioner, p. W. 1 was examined and trxs. Al to 44 were marked. trx. B1 was marked on behalf of respondents. 4. The Trial Court considering the oral and documentary cvidence granted Rs. 25,OO0/_ with interest T.
So/o @ per annum from the clate of pctition to tili the date of deposit. Challenging the quantum of compensation as meagre, the petitioner has hled the present appcal. 5 Heard learned counsel for appellant. No representation for respondents. perused the record 6. As per Ex. A2, report of Medical Officer' petitioner over right left over right thigh' laceration sustained contusion lcft laceration over over right ankle, dbia area, laceration Ofhcer examine any Medial calcaheurn. Petitioner did not Court hnds it the nature of injuries' this 7. Considering injuries' Rs' 1O'00O/-grant Rs'22,0OO/- towards reasonable to loss of Rs' 1O'0oO/- towards towards pain and suffering, Rs-5'000/-extra nourishment' amenities, Rs'5,000/-towards and Rs 5'OOO/-towards attendant towards transportation expenses and charges, Rs. 10,O0O/ - towards medical of earnings' Rs. 1O,00O/- towards loss 1S e ntitled for the the appellant/ petitioner 8. Therefore, in the following terms compensation Rs.
22,OOO/- Injuries 1 Rs. 1o,OOO/- 2 Pain and Suffering Rs. 10,OO0/- Loss of Amenities 3 Rs 5,ooO/- Transportation 4 Rs. 5,oO0/- Exffa nourishment 5 Rs. 5,0O0/- Attendant charges 6 Rs. 10,OOO/- 7 loss of earnings Rs. 10,0O0/- 8 Medical expenses Rs. 77,OOO/- TOTAL 9 In the resurt, the appeal is partry aflowed by enhancing the compensadon amount from Rs. 25,O00/_ to Rs. 77,OO0/_ (Rupees Sevent5r seven Thousand onry) with interest at the rate of 7. Sok per annum from the date of filing the petition till date of realization. Respondent No. 2 shall deposit the entire amount within a Period of one month from the date of recerpt of a copy of this order. On such Deposit, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the total amount along with interest accrued on it. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, i1 any, shall stand closed SD/. A. V. S. PRASAD DEPUTY RETSTRAR I //TRUE COPY// secr8il(rrrcen To, 1.
The chairman N/otor Accident craims Tribunar -cum- rV Additionar District (ll FTC) Natgonda. 2. One CC to SRl. P S P SURESH KUMAR, Advocate tOpUCl 3. One CC to SRl. R K SUR| Advocate, tOpUCl 4. Two CD Copies K : . ':: i'"rr&. ::r i-.. - '1 '-' i'r t DATED:22to4t2O2S ii J'! -! : a rs tf:! () t i DEsi JUDGEMENT MACMA. N o. 42 of 2011 PARTLY ALLOWING OF THE MACMA WITHOUT COSTS a 4 ,,5 /t /s v 3208 ] [ TELANGANA HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF AT HYDERABAD DAY OF APRIL TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND FIVE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA LNO 0F MISCELLANEOUS APPEA 1 42 2011 MOTOR ACCID ENT CIVIL Between: --I -6rnOuoudi Rl/o. Raingudem Village' S/o. Bixamaiah Lorry Cleaner . Ramulu, District' Thiparthy Mandal, Nalgonda ... AppellanUClaimant AND Owne-r-of Lorry Reddy, A-ged Major Business 1 D. Sanieeva Reddy, S/o. Gopal E.. "rii"1i"lionp zilL AZSS C/,c. rr,r/s. siri dataji Lrirry supply office, BEside iJir'<i*ri;ii ni. o"iition.
, Huzarnagar village and Mandal' il;'N;'iil;; X;;;;;;A c" Ltd, viie Police No'62070031/04/0662e 2 O/,c. Sudarsnan Complex, Patamata, Vijayawada' ... ResPondents/ResPondents judgment and 173 of M'V'Act against the decree Appeal filed under Section Court of 2006 on the file of the of the in M. V. O. P'No 474 daled 01-12-2010 ChairmanMotorAccidentClaimsTribunal-cum-lVAdditionalDistrict(llFTC) Nalgonda ORDER: This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of and the material papers in the and Decree of the Court below appeal, the Judgment for arguments of Sri P'S'P' Suresh kumar' Advocate MVOP and upon hearing the Counsel for the Respondent No'2. the appellant and of Sri R. K. Suri, follows: This Court doth Order and Decree as 1. That the tvlACtr/lA appeal be and hereby is partly allowed by Enhancing the Compensation amount from RS. 25,000/- to RS. 77,000 (Rupees Seventy P. a. from the date of filing the seven thousand only) with interest @7.
5o/o petition till the date of realization the Entire amount within a period of 2. Thalthe Respondent No. 2 Shall deposit one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order 3 That on such deposit, the petitioner is be and here by permitted the total amount ' to withdraw along with interest , accrueO il' the decree ' sha, stands J,iXl;ffii1;t::T" "ii;";;;; conrirmed in a, 5. That there shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. ,:. "1+i'-? SE+3lR //TRUE COPY// To, secr$ri(rncea 1 Motor Accident craims rribunar [iFfJil[T,! : -cum- rv Additionar District 2 Two CD Copies DATED:22tO4t2OZs DECREE MACMA. N o. 42 of 2011 PARTLY ALLOWING OF THE MACMA WITHOUT COSTS 4 4 ,. o /1 7/,
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.