Skip to main content
LawSphereX

RADHAMANI v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

Court: High Court of Kerala

Bench: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS

Judgment date:

Case summary

High Court of Kerala judgment dated 2025-03-26. RADHAMANI v. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

2025:KER:26374 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C. S. DIAS TH WEDNESDAY, THE 26 DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 30951 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: RADHAMANI AGED 64 YEARS W/O SUKUMARAN BIDHU VALASOM, KARIAMTHOTTUVA, SASTHAMKOTTA. P. O, KUNNATHOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690540 BY ADVS. V. SETHUNATH V. R. MANORANJAN (MUVATTUPUZHA) THOMAS ABRAHAM (K/1051/2010) LAKSHMINARAYAN. R SREEGANESH U. GAUTHAM KRISHNAN K. G. SNEHA MARY SANTHOSH RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER SASTHAMKOTTA POLICE STATION, SASTHAMKOTTA. P. O, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690521 2 RAMACHANDRAN RINKU BHAVANAM HOUSE, NEELSHWARAM P. O, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691505 3 SATHIAMMA W/O RAMACHANDRAN , RINKU BHAVANAM, NEELESHWRAM. P. O, NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARARKKAR TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691505 4 REENA D/O RAMACHANDRAN, RINKU BHAVANAM, NEESHWARAM. P.

O, 2025:KER:26374 NEDUVATHOOR VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691505 BY ADVS. Thomas Abraham MERCIAMMA MATHEW(K/709/2002) ASWIN. P. JOHN(K/324/2013) R. ANANTHAPADMANABAN(K/000058/2017) PAUL BABY(K/1390/2021) THARA ELIZABETH THOMAS(K/000718/2024) SWATHY A. P. (K/001801/2021) OTHER PRESENT: GP. SMT. VIDHYA KURIAKOSE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26. 03. 2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:26374 C. S. DIAS, J. --------------------------------------- WP(C) No. 30951 OF 2024 -----------------------------------------th Dated this the 26 day of March, 2025 JUDGMENT st The writ petition is filed to direct the 1 respondent to afford adequate police protection to the life of the petitioner from the threats of the respondents 2 to 4 and their men. 2. When the writ petition came up for consideration st on 03. 02.

2025, this Court directed the 1 respondent to ensure that law and order is maintained in the petitioner's locality, without interfering in any civil dispute between the petitioner and the respondents 2 to 4. 3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the party respondents. 4. On a consideration of the facts and the materials on record, I am of the view that a quietus can be given to the writ petition by making the interim order dated 03. 02. 2025 absolute. 2025:KER:26374 Resultantly, the writ petition is disposed of by making the interim order dated 03. 02. 2025 absolute. Sd/- C. S. DIAS, JUDGE rkc/26. 03. 25 NO. 30951 OF 2024 2025:KER:26374 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 30951/2024 . THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA AS PER THANDAPER NO. 7957 DATED 11-06-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA AS PER THANDAPER NO.

4825 DATED 11-06-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA AS PER THANDAPER NO 12815 DATED 11-06-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA AS PER THANDAPER NO. 12818 DATED 11-06-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA DATED 11-06-2024 AS PER THANDAPER NO. 12817 THE TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPTS ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTA DATED 05-07-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16-08-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 16-08-2024 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER’S DAUGHTER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 29-8-2024 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 16/ 2010 DATED 11-03-2010 ISSUED BY THE STATE POLICE CHIEF

Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.