SMTI. SHARDA RANI AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-11-27. SMTI. SHARDA RANI AND 2 ORS. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/2 GAHC010138412020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2701/2020 SMTI. SHARDA RANI AND 2 ORS. W/O LATE BALDEV SINGH, HOTEL VANDANA, OPP. ASTC, PALTANBAZAR, G. S. ROAD, P. O. AND P. S. -PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI, DIST-KAMRUP(M), ASSAM-781008 2: HARCHARAN SINGH SODHI @ VICKY 3: HARMINDER SINGH SODHI @ LUCK VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR ORDER Date : 27-11-2020 27. 11. 2020 Heard Mr. D Gogoi, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. SH Borah, learned Addl. Public prosecutor for the State respondent. Page No. # 2/2 By this petition under Section 438 Cr. P. C. , the petitioners, namely, 1. Sharda Rani, 2. Harcharan Singh Sodhi @ Vicky and 3.
Harminder Singh Sodhi @ Lucky have prayed for pre-arrest bail apprehending arrest in connection with Paltanbazar PS Case No. 1019/2019 ( GR No. 14270/2019) under Sections 120B/468/471 of the IPC. Case diary is received. On perusal of the case diary, it is noticed that in terms of the conditions of the interim pre-arrest bail granted vide order, dated 08. 10. 2020, the petitioners have appeared before the I. O. and got their statements recorded under Section 161 Cr. P. C. The petitioners are co-operating in the investigation and there is no adverse report against them from the I. O.. The case diary reveals no justifiable reason for custodial interrogation of the petitioners in the interest of further investigation of the case. In view of above, the interim anticipatory bail granted in favour of the petitioners named above, vide order, dated 08. 10. 2020, is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions (i) that the petitioners shall appear before the I. O.
as and when required for the purpose of investigation; (ii) that the petitioners shall not hamper or tamper with the investigation in any manner; and iii) that the petitioner shall not commit any similar offence, of which they are suspected of commission. With the above directions, the anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Gauhati High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.