Skip to main content
LawSphereX

Md. Eklakh Ahmad @ Md. Eklakh v. The State of Bihar

Court: Patna High Court

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Judgment date:

Case summary

Patna High Court judgment dated 2026-04-22. Md. Eklakh Ahmad @ Md. Eklakh v. The State of Bihar. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 26691 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No. -3 Year-2026 Thana- KARPURIGRAM District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Eklakh Ahmad @ Md. Eklakh S/o Late Md. Nijamuddin R/o Vill. - Mukundpur, P. S. - Karpurigram, Dist. - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Karpurigram P. S. Case No.

03 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 351(2), 352, 109 & 3(5) of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others have fired at the house of the informant. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the nature of allegation as alleged against the petitioner is general and omnibus. It has further been submitted that no cartridge has been recovered from the place of occurrence. It has further been submitted that nobody has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 26691 of 2026(2) dt. 22-04-2026 2/2 received any injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in judicial custody since 19. 02. 2026. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned st J. M. - 1 Class, Samastipur, in connection with Karpurigram P. S. Case No. 03 of 2026. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T

Source: Patna High Court. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.