Devi Reddy Srikanth Reddy v. State of Telangana

Court: High Court for State of Telangana

Bench: K. SARATH

Judgment date: 2025-12-10

Case summary

High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-12-10. Devi Reddy Srikanth Reddy v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.

Judgment text

[ 3302 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH Between: Devi Reddy Srikanth Reddy, S/o: D. Rami Aged 41 years, Bqddy, Occ. Business, R/o. Flat No. 50i, Madhavi Mansion Block Bommarillu Homes, Puppalguda, Pineline Road, Manikonda, Hyd. ... PETITIONER AND 1 State of relangana, rep! 'e. sgltqd principal by its Secretary, Department of Revenue, T. S. Secretdriat, Hyderabad 2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.. 3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District. 4- The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. I ...

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the a nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3, 4 and their sub-ordinates in interfering and trying to remove the fencing stones in respect of his Plot No. 47, admeasuring 400 Sq. yds in Sy. No. 3Ol24, situated phase at ll, vinayak Nagar colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot without issuing any notice or without following due process of law, is illegai, arbitrary, violative or Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequenly direct the Respondent No. 3,4 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of his Plot No. 47, admeasuring 400 Sq.

yds, comprised in Sy. No. 36/24, situated at Phase ll, Vinayak Nagar colony, Gopanpally Village, 'serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing notice. lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition undersection 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct Respondent no'3 and 7 and their sub-ordinates not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in respect of her prot No. 47, admeasuring 400 Sq. yds, comprised in sy. No. 36/24, situated phase at ,, vinayak Nagar corony, Gopanpally Viltage, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of law and without issuing any notice. counset for the petitioner: SRr ESLAVATH RAJU FoR E. RAMESH CHANDRA GOUD counsel for the Respondents: SMT. s. SRAVANTHI, AGp FoR REVENUE The Court made the foltowing: ORDER t.

a IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION No. 3358 of 2O22 (DATED, THIS THE lOrH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2o25l- Between: Sri Devi Reddy Srikanth Reddy . Petitioner AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad & three others. I ... Respondents I ORDER: Heard Sri Eslavath Raju, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the a respondents and perused the material on record. 2, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner filed the present Writ Petition seeking to declare the t ,. rran *'l-'---ql , sr,J action of respondent Nos. 3, 4 and their subordinates in interfering with and attempting to remove the fencing stones in respect of petitioner's Plot No. 47, admeasuring 40O Sq. yards in Sy. No.

36 situated /24, at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar Colony, Gopanpally Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his plot, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, as illegal and arbitrar5r. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that while admitting the matter, this Court passed interim order dated 28. O1. 2022 wrrh a direction to maintain status gto existing as on that date until the next date of hearing in respect of the subject property. However, in spite of lapse more than three and half years the respondent authorities did not chose to file counter or vacate petition denying the averments made by the petitioner in the writ affidavit. In view of the same, learned counsel requested this Court to allow the Writ Petition by directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner respect to the subject property without following due of law. 4.

On the other hand, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submits that if the petitioner possession of the subject property, the respondents interfere with the petitioner's possession of the property, without following due process of law and requested this Court to pass appropriate orders. 5. In view of the submissions made on either side, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities not to interfere with the possession petitioner in Plot No. 47, admeasuring 4OO Sq. Yards in Sy. No. 36 situated at Phase II, Vinayak Nagar 124, Gopanpally village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga srr,J District, without following due procedure of law. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ Petition, shall stand closed. SD/. M. NAGAMANI ANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ N OFFICER To, of Department of Revenue, T. S. Secretariat, State 1. The Principal secretary, Telangana, HYderabad. 2.

The District collector, Ranga Reddy District. The Revenue Divisional officer' Rajendra Nagar Division, RR District' \ 3. The Tahsildar, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' T 4. One CC to Sri Eslavath Raju, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 6. Two CD CoPies TJ 5 i l ikl , b,- HIGH COURT DATED:1011212025 ,.... '. -... -... -t 'THE S ORDER o () 0 6 Jfi|,l ? 02[ WP. No. 3358 of 2022 . o i2 -,. t'. 1 t DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION a WITHOUT COSTS ^. # . r Jo(

Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.