Smt. T.Lakshmi v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: A.ABHISHEK REDDY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2020-12-14. Smt. T.Lakshmi v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 18503 OF 2020 Between: Smt. T. Lakshmi, W/o P. Jayaram Reddy, Aged about 47 years, Occ. Housewife, Fl/o Callas, USA, represented by her Special Power of Attorney Holder, Sri P. Krishna Reddy, S/o late Pattabhi Rami reddy, aged about 84 years, Occ. Retired Civil Servant, Fl/o H. No. 1040, Road No. 51 , Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -500033. . -. PET|T|ONER AND '1 . State of Telangana, represented by lts Principal Secretary to the Government, I\/unicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad [Vlunicipal Corporation, CC Complex, LowerTank Bund, Hyderabad. 3. The Zonal Commissioner, West Zone, GHMC, Serilingampally, Hyderabad. 4. The Assistant City Planner, West Zone, GHMC, Serilingampally, Hyderabad. 5.
M/s Bhashyam Projects, represented by lVanaging Partner, Bhashyam Naveen S/o B. Venkat Rao, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Business, R/o Flat No. 201 , Ramaselhu Nilayam, S. R. Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 038 ,.. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction, or more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action the Respondents more particularly the 2nd Respondent herein, in not takrng action on the representation dated 71912020, requesting to conduct a summary enquiry in terms of section 450 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 19 so as to find out whether the permission granted in favour of the 5th Respond in respect of the property bearing Plot No. 107, measuring 500 Sq Yars, situated in the layout made in Survey Nos.
41 and 42, at Guttala Begumpet Village, presently known as Kavuri Hills, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, suffers from any fraudulent misrepresentation as regards title to the property, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, and the Rules made there under, besides, being violative of Constitution and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent to afford an opportunity to participate in the said summary enquiry.
fA NO: 1 OF 2020 '151 Petition under Section CPC praying ihat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the representation dated 71912020, requesting to conduct a summary enquiry in terms of section 450 of Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955, so as to find out whether the permission granted in favour of the sth Respondent in respect of the property bearing Plot No. 107, measuring 500 Sq Yars, situated in the layout made in Survey Nos. 41 and 42, at Buttala Begumpet Village, presently known as Kavuri Hills, Serlingampally [t4andal, Ranga Reddy District, suffers from any fraudulent misrepresentation as regards title to the property, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent to stop the construction forthwith that is being carried out by the sth Respondent, in respect of the property bearing Plot No. 107, measuring 500 Sq Yars, situated in the layout made in Survey Nos. 41 and 42, at Guttala Begumpet Village, presently known as Kavuri Hills, Serlingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, in terms of the permission granted in File No. 21C2O12183412019, dated 81112020, till such time, the summary enquiry is conducted and concluded so as to arrive at a conclusion the said permission is outcome of fraudulent misrepresentation, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G. ANANDAM Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.
2 to 4: SRI SAMPATH PRABHKAR REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No. 5: SRI K. V. SATYA RAMACHANDRA RAO The Court made thc lbllorving: ORDER THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 185O3 of 2O2O ORDER: Sri G. Anandam, the learned counsel for the petitioner, addressed a letter dated 1I. 12. 202O to the Registry seeking withdrawal of the Writ Petition. In view of the letter dated 11. 12. 2O2O the writ petition is clismissed as wiLhdrau,n. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/-T. KRISHNA KU I ASSISTANT RE //TRUE COPY// SECT N OFFICER To, '1 . One CC to Sri G. Anandam, Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for lvlunicipal Administration and Urban Development, Hioh Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Orie CC to Sri Sampath Prabhakbr Reddy, SC for GHIr/C, Advocate toPUCl +. bne CC to Sri K. V. Satya Ramachandra Rao, Advocate IOPUCI 5.
Two CD Copies SM \" HIGH COURT DATED:1411212020 1 flE SIA T€ ORDER ( . ( WP. No. 18503 ot 2020 3 ,18 DEC2020 * ,)x Fi\Tcii L-* DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS SSV, . C-oPrel\ -r Itr \e\r-\r-o'a
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.