Leishangthem Romi Chanu v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS
Court: High Court of Manipur
Bench: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Manipur judgment dated 2024-09-17. Leishangthem Romi Chanu v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND 2 OTHERS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Item No. 9-10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 654 of 2024 with MC(WP(C) No. 546 of 2024 Leishangthem Romi Chanu & 4 Ors. ….. Petitioner/s - Versus – State of Manipur & 2 Ors. .... Respondent/s BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA Order 17. 09. 2024 [1] Heard Mr. K. Modhusudon, learned counsel for the petitioners. [2] By the present writ petition, the petitioners have approached this Court for linking up of their ad-hoc service rendered by them in the Department of Education as Primary Teachers prior to their regularization. [3] Mr. K. Modhusudon, learned counsel for the petitioners, draws the attention of this Court to Annexures – A/9 to A/12 whereby the petitioners herein submitted a similar representations all dated 29. 08. 2024 to the Director of Education (S), Government of Manipur regarding their ad-hoc service and it is stated that the representations are pending before the authority.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition may be disposed of at this stage by directing the respondent No. 3 to dispose of the representations submitted by the petitioners by a speaking order within a stipulated period of time. [4] Mrs. RK. Emily, learned Dy. G. A. for the State respondent, has no objection to the passing of the innocuous order. [5] Recording the submissions made at the bar, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 3/Director of Education (S), Government of Manipur to consider and dispose of the representations dated 29. 08. 2024 submitted by the petitioners by a speaking order as per rule within a period of 3 (three) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. [6] It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case. [7] With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. [8] Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for all the parties. JUDGE Kh.
Joshua Maring Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA KH. JOSHUA MARING MARING Date: 2024. 09. 18 13:23:44 +05'30'
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.