SARMA MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-16. SARMA MUNDA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9895 of 2020 1. Sarma Munda 2. Rajkumar Oraon … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, Addl. P. P. 02 /16. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown is over. In view of personal undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Chanho P. S. Case No. 161 of 2019 registered under sections 385/386/387 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Explosive Act and Section 17 of CLA Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that some miscreants came to the construction site of the informant and threatened of dire consequences if the ransom money would not be paid to them and they claiming themselves to be the members of the PLFI. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the petitioners are not named in the F. I. R. and they have not been put to T. I. Parade yet and the charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioners. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioners has been in custody since 08. 01. 2020 as mentioned in paragraph 15 of the bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of st the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J. M. 1 Class, Ranchi in connection with Chanho P. S. Case No. 161 of 2019 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case. Pappu/ (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. )
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.