Mr. B. Bhaskara Rao v. The State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K. SARATH
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-11-27. Mr. B. Bhaskara Rao v. The State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
, [ 3302 I IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 35925 OF 2025 Between: Mr. B. Bhaskara Rao, W/o. Mr. B. Raghavaiah, age 60 Years, Occ ; Senior Assistant, 0/o. The Commissioner of Commercial Tax Office, Nampaily, Hyderabad. ..... PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principle Secretary, Revenue (Registration-ll) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Registrar of Chits, Government of Telangana, 0/0. The Commissioner and lnspector General Registration and Stamp, M. J. Market, Hyderabad. 3. The Deputy Registrar of Chits/Arbitrator, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, At Medchal. Earlier Ranga Reddy District(East). 4. M/s. Shriram Chits Pvt Ltd, L. B. Nagar Branch, Rep by its Senior Manager cum GPA Holder Mr. G. Srinivas. 5. Mrs. B. Padma, W/o. B.
Bhaskara Rao, Aged about 54 years, Occ Business, R/o. H. No . 4-13, Sri Srinivasapuram, Gurramguda, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ..... RESPONDENTS . Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased. to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particutarly one in the Writ of Mandamus by declaring the Award and Recovery Certiflcate passed by 3rd respondent in A. A /C. F. No. 76t2O12 dt. 1410812013 contrary to Rule violated the Rule 55(1) and (2) of Telangana Chit Fund Rules, 2008, as illegal, arbitrary and in executable and consequential quash the award passed in A. A/C. F. N o. 76t2012 dt. 14t}8t2}13 by the 3rd respondent and consequential 4th * t I I I ): _,ry -- ::r: // /' ,a/ respondent filed an execution petition in EP No.
21 4 of 2018 on the file of 1st Senior Civil Ju<lge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad without getting it transferred by filing petition berfore the 3rd respondent is also illegal, arbitrary. |. A. NO:1 OF 2025 Petition tJnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fileJ in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in EP No. 21 4t2018 on the file of the 1st senior civil Judge, city civil court, at, Hyderabad pursuant to the impugned award and Recovery certif cate passed in A. A /c. F. No. 76/2012, dt. 14-o}-2013 as filed by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the main writ petition. counsel for the Petitioner : sRr NARS| REDDY PESARA Counsel for the, Respondent Nos. l to 3 : AGp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : - The Court madr: the following ORDER tLi . ,tl i rr,i I 'li .. 1 *'l. i ,,,,-\'... \ THE HONOURABTE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH UIRIT No. 35925 of 2o25.
ORDER: Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect on the Court bundle. 2. Accordingly, permission is granted as sought for and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawrr. There sha1l be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if &ny, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. I I SD/. M. JAWAHAR t REDDY t ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII 6 sEcTtoN oFFtcER To 1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at _ Uyderabad. [OUT] . . 2. ONE CC tO SRt NARST REDDY PESARA, AdVOCAIE -- TOPUC] Two CD Copies _ 9_. SA/BSK ( q$a \ / F HIGH COURT DATED:2711112025 (: ;;niltH; () rJ 4 il 7 trlq 2u$ ) * * ORDER WP. No. 3li925 of 2025 DISMISSfiNG THE W. P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. D re* -6ru ,,rrlrl ).
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.