Sirivella Subbarayulu, v. State by Station House officer,
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: K.SURENDER
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2025-04-04. Sirivella Subbarayulu, v. State by Station House officer,. Read the judgment and case details...
Judgment text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTIGE K. SURENDER : I CRIMINAL PETITION NO: oF 2021 l Between t i I 1 Sirivella Sub_barayulu, S/o. S. Rajaiah, I Aged about 79 ydars, Occ: Retd. Add'itional Superintendent police, ! of I 2 S Devka Rani,, D/o. S. subbarayulu, I Occ: House wife, Aged about 5. i yedrs, I I I Respondents 1 & 2 Rlo. Flat No. S04. 7th Block - -- '' Green Park Apartment, D. R. Mahat I doaO, I I rrupathi, Chittoor District. l Andhra I Pradesh ... Petitioner/Accused A-1 & 2 I And I 1 . State by Station House officer, Potice Station, Hyderabad, flanjqgutla Rep. by public prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad. 2. G. Srinrvasa Babu, S/o. G. Ramakrishna Murthv_ about 45 years, Occ 19ed Architect, R/o. H. No. 8-3-903/g, Naqariuna Naoar. - Ameerpet, Hyderabad. .. RespondenUComplainants Petrtion under Section 4g2 of Cr. p.
C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l/emorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in cc. No. 264 41202o on the fite of the XtV Additional Chief Metropotitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. r. A NO 10F 2021 Petition under section 492 0r ct. p. c praying that in the circumstances I I stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, l the High court may I I be pleased to stay arr further proceedings incruding appearance of the petitioners in CC. No. 2644 t202O on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Metropotitan ; Magistrate, Nampafly, Hyderabad. I I This Pet ttorr coming on for hearing, upon perusing the f\'emorandum of Grounds of 3ri rrinal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S. V. Ram ana, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Ar;sistant Public Prosecutor orr L,e r alf of the Respondent No. 1 . and of Sri N l\marnath, Advocate for the Responr:e r No. 2.
The Court made, tire following: ORDER I I I I I I I I I I I i l I i, l THE HONOURABLE SRI JuSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No . 600 ()F 2021 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. Criminal 2. Permission is accorded 3. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/- AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN .! ASSTSTANT REGISIRAR t' //TRUE COPY// - t-i\l sEcrloN-of#cER To, 1. The XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad 2. One CC to Sri S. V. Ramana, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to The Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies PD- l I HIGH COURT DAf ED/141'2025 -41= t 1r- jf4 14: Ots ( $\ c o 2 1 rur,i ZIA ': ORDER t D r:. * r,! '! I! :') fr \ CRLP. No. 6tlCt c'f 12021 DISMISSED A{J \A/ITHDRAWN ? il- I 1? 4
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.