DARA SINGH ALIAS NISHANT JEE ALIAS AMIT KUMAR ALIAS PARSANJEET v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2020-12-17. DARA SINGH ALIAS NISHANT JEE ALIAS AMIT KUMAR ALIAS PARSANJEET v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the...
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 10010 of 2020 ------ Dara Singh @ Nishant Jee @ Amit Kumar @ Parsanjeet @ Prasanjeet … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. S. Roy, Addl. P. P. ------ Order No. 02 Dated- 17. 12. 2020 Heard the parties through video conferencing. Learned counsel for the petitioner personally undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the stamp reporter within two weeks after the lockdown period is over. In view of the personal undertaking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the defects pointed out by the stamp reporter are ignored for the present. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Mohammadganj P. S. Case No. 36 of 2019 (G. R. No. 1295 of 2019) registered under sections 25 (1-B)a/26/35 of Arms Act and under Section 17 of C. L. A. Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that police recovered pamphlets of T. P. C. organization and country made pistol from the possession of the petitioner and co-accused persons. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10. 07. 2020 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 13 of the bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above named petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S. D. J. M. , Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Mohammadganj P. S. Case No. 36 of 2019 (G. R. No. 1295 of 2019) with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J. ) Sonu-Gunjan/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.