AMRIT CEMENT LIMITED v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR.
Court: High Court of Meghalaya
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT MORE (FORMER JUDGE)
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Meghalaya judgment dated 2020-09-21. AMRIT CEMENT LIMITED v. STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Serial No. 02-08 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 220 of 2020 with WP(C). No. 221 of 2020 WP(C). No. 222 of 2020 WP(C). No. 223 of 2020 WP(C). No. 224 of 2020 WP(C). No. 225 of 2020 WP(C). No. 235 of 2020 Date of Order: 21. 09. 2020 Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Amrit Cement Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Hills Cement Company Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Green Valley Industries Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Meghalaya Cements Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Star Cements Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Goldstone Cements Limited Vs. State of Meghalaya & Anr. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjit More, Judge. Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Dr. AK. Saraf, Sr. Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. N. D. Chullai, AAG with Mr. A. Kharwanlang, GA. Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. Sr. GA. Mr. H. Abraham, GA. Ms. I. Lyngwa, GA. Ms. Z. Nongkynrih, GA. Ms. A. Thungwa, GA. 1.
Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties, I deem it convenient to dispose of these writ petitions by directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation dated 23-06-2020 of the All Jaintia Cement Manufacturers Association, Lumshnong, East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya as early as possible and in any case, within a period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Ordered accordingly. 2. It is made clear that the respondent No. 2 shall dispose of the said application on its own merit and in accordance with law. Needless to say, the respondent No. 2 shall decide the application after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. 3. It is further made clear that petitioners are at liberty to approach this Court in the event any order adverse to their interest is passed by respondent No. 2. 4. The petitioners/their representatives shall remain present in the office of respondent No.
2 along with copy of this order and copy of their representation at 11 AM on 28-09-2020 in order to enable respondent No. 2 to comply with this order effectively. 5. Accordingly, writ petitions stand disposed of. Judge Meghalaya 21. 09. 2020 “Samantha PS”
Source: High Court of Meghalaya. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.