Smt. Lingamolla Manjula v. Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2026-04-30. Smt. Lingamolla Manjula v. Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari. Read the judgment and case details on...
Judgment text
[ 33041 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 634 OF 2025 Petition Under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia against the order passed in O. S. No. 98 ot 2022 on the file of the Court of the ll Additionat District and Sessions Judge Sanga Reddy. Between: Smt. Lingamolla Manjula, Wo Lingamolla Shiva Kumar Aged 24 years, occ. House wife R/o H. No. 2-5911 Hasnabad Village, Raikode Mandal, Sanga Reddy district. ... Petitioner/Plaintiff AND 1. Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari, Wo Julakanti Venkatesh Aged 32 years, Occ. House hold 2. Jukanti Nagesh, Sio Jukanti Srinivas Aged 32 years, Occ. Business, R:/o plot No. 1, Sy. No. 385, ODF Colony Near Master Mind School, pothoreddypally village Sanga Reddy Mandal and District 3. Batchu Anjan Kumar, S/o Batchu Eshwaraiah Aged 40 years, occ. Pvt. Employee R/. o H. No.
3-16/1 Shankarampet R Village and Mandal Medak district. ... Respondents/Defendants Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri. P Padma Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Ms. Nikita Goenka The Court made the following: ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI . 'USTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO DATE:30. O4. 2026 CIVIL REVI SION PETITION No. 634 F 2025 Between: Smt. Lingamolra Manjula ... Petitioner/Plaintiff AND Smt. Ausula Meena Kumari and 2 others. ... Respondents/ Defendants ORDER The present Civil Revision Petition is filed seeking a cjirectlon for expediiious disposal of the suit in O. S. No'98 of 2022 oending on the file of the II Additional District and . Sessicns Judge, Sangareddy. 2. Heard Mr. P. Padma Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, and Ms. Nikita Goenka, learned counsel appearing ior the respondents. Perused the material available on re co rd J- 3. The suit in O. S. No.
9B of 2022 was filed by the petitioner/ plaintiff directing defendant Nos. 1 and 2 to cancer the sare ceed of defendant No. 3 riith mutual consent and to execute a ! :aie i eed in favour of the plaintiff in respect oF the suit scherruie prcperty by receiving the balance sale consideration of Rs. 60,00,000/- and if defendant fails to execute the sale deeci, Ine Ccurt may itself execute the sale deed on their- behall. oy permitting the plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration amount into Court for accomplishment of agreement of sale, Cated 07. 07. 2021. Furiher to declare the registered sale deed bearing Doc. No. 10419/2021, dated 22. t2. 2021 executed by the defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in favour of defendant No. 3 as null ar vcid and not binding on the plaintiff. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this Civil Revision petition may be disposed of by directing the trial Court to dispose of the suit in O. S. No.
98 of 20J2 expeditiously, since respondents/deFendant Nos. 2 and 3 have been protracting the suit without any representation. 5, Learned counsel appearing for the respondents did not cppose the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. ) 6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, vv;irc. -r.. exoressirig arl v rlpinion on the merits of the matter, this Civil Revision Petirion is dlsposed of, directing the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy, to dispose cf O. S. No. 9B of 2022 as expeditiously as possible, ln accorCance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. A: a sequel, nriscellaneous applications pending, if any, :n this Clvi! ReVision Pert[ioi. t, shali stand closed. SD/- N SRIHARI, DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (e SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The ll Additional District and Sessions Judge Sanga Reddy 2. One CC to SRl. P PADMA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Ms NIKITA GOENKA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies K 6 i. .. ,-.
HIGH COURT DATED: 3010412026 i',. ,, -;'|t aa\ ,. \ ORDER I I it', : . : CRP. No. 634 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRP WITHOUTCOSTS Lt ol
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.