Karthik Andru v. State of Telangana
Court: High Court for State of Telangana
Bench: JUVVADI SRIDEVI
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court for State of Telangana judgment dated 2024-12-13. Karthik Andru v. State of Telangana. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
I 132s71 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY HE THIRTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: '151s6 OF 2024 Between: Karthik Andru, Sio. A Sesha Giri Rao Aged 34 years, Occ: private employee R/o. Plot No- 17lB, First Floor, HC Towers, Beside Arjun Theatre, KPHB, Hyderabad ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No. 4 AND 1. State of Telangana, Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad 2. Sri. Ranjith Lukka, S/o Rama Rao, Aged aboul41yrs, Occ: lvlanager in Tata '14-163, Capital Housing Finance Limited, H. No: Mirjalaguda, Malkajgiri Hyderabad ... RESPONDENTS/E-FACTO COMPLAINANT Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S. , praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the CC No. 494/2018 on the file of XIV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad so far as the petitioner/A.
4 is concerned. l. A. NO: 1OF 2024 Petition under Section 528 of B. N. S. S. , praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the presence of this petitioner/A. 4 in cc. No. 494/2018 on the file of XIV Additonal chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad during the pendency of the above criminal petition' This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri MAHADEV ANYARAMBHATLA, Advocate for the Petitioner and of Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf ofthe Respondent No. 1 and None Appeared forthe Respondent No. 2. The Court made the following: ORDER / I HON'I}L-E S\,IT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CIiIN'llNAL PE'IITION No. l5l56 of 2024 OIIDEIT: This Criminal Pctition is filed by the petitioner/accused No.
4 to quash the proceedings against him in C. C. No. 494 of 2018 t pending on thc lltc o1' XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan t Magistrate, Fll,dcrabad City, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420,167 and 471 oflPC. 2. Heard Sri A. Mahadev, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Jithender Rao Vccramalla, learned Additional prosecutor Public appearing fbr thc l'' respondcnt-State and perused the record. -fhough 3. the petition is flled lbr quashing the proceedings, I during the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with the I presence of the pe'titioncr/accuscd No. 4 before the trial Court. 4. Hence, this petition IS disposed of dispensing with the appearance of thc petitionerlaccused No. 4 before the trial Court unless his presencc is specilically required during the course of (1 trial, subject to the condition of pctitioner/accused No.
4 being represented by his counsel on every date ofhearing. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. A. V. S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// / flt U SECTION OFFICER To '1. The XIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad City. 2. The Station House Officer, Panjagutta Police Station, Hyderabad. Telangana 3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of at Hiderabad (OUT) 4 Ohe CC to SRI MAHADEV ANYARAMBHATLA, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CD Copies pr ? & l I I HIGH COURT DATED:1311212024 iE" ll t: I4 ( o 30 0E[ 20a -li * f) r,AJ C t-L) ORDER CRLP. No. 15156 of 2024 DISPOSING OF CRL. PETITION l+ I '? -- 2+ l"l SCetie_)
Source: High Court for State of Telangana. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.