SANTOSH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Court: High Court of Jharkhand
Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 2024-12-14. SANTOSH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT DATED 14. 12. 2024 HELD AT JHARKHAND HIGH COURT, RANCHI [Organized by High Court Legal Services Committee under Section 19, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, (Central Act)] BENCH NO. 1 COURT NO. 7 Case No. : W. P. (S). No. 1263 of 2024 1. Petitioner/ Appellant:- Santosh Kumar Versus 2. Respondent/O. P. (s). :- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Name of Hon’ble Judge:- Hon’ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak Name of Advocate Member:- Mr. Sreenu Garapati, S. C. -III AWARD The dispute between the parties having been referred for determination to the National Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised/ settled the case/ matter upto the extent of Award, the following award is passed in term of settlement as per the order enclosed herewith. The parties are informed that the Court fee, if any, paid by any of them shall be refunded. ……………………………….. …………………………. Petitioner/ Plaintiff/Appellant Respondent/O. P. …………………………. ………………………….. Sign. of Hon’ble Judge Sign.
of Advocate Member (Seal of the Committee) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (National Lok Adalat) W. P. (S). No. 1263 of 2024 ---------- Santosh Kumar … ... Petitioner -Versus- State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... … Respondents ---------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK MR. SREENU GARAPATI, SC-III For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kr. Jha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Anoop Kr. Agrawall, Advocate ---------- 14. 12. 2024 Today, this case is listed before the National Lok Adalat for adjudication of the disputes between the parties. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the respondent-University that entire benefits under the head of retiral-cum-pensionary benefits have been th extended to the petitioner and pay-revision as per 6 PRC shall be done within a short span of time. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not object to the same.
In view of fair submissions of learned counsel for the parties and in view of undertaking given by the learned counsel representing the respondent-University, it appears that petitioner has received the retiral-cum-pensionary benefits. So far th as fixation of pay as per 6 PRC is concerned, the respondents are directed to revise the same within a period of four weeks. The matter stands settled and award is decreed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Sreenu Garapati) (Dr. S. N. Pathak, J. ) Sign. Advocate Member Sign. of Hon’ble Judge Kunal/
Source: High Court of Jharkhand. Dataset: Dattam Labs. CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.