SUKUMAR NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA
Court: High Court of Orissa
Bench: MR. JUSTICE S.K.SAHOO
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Orissa judgment dated 2024-12-24. SUKUMAR NAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 12829 of 2024 Sukumar Nayak …. Petitioner Ms. Arunima Mishra, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opp. Party Mr. P. P. Behera Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE S. K. SAHOO ORDER Order No. 24. 12. 2024 01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). This is an application under section 483 of B. N. S. S. in connection with Kujanga P. S Case No. 549 of 2024 corresponding to G. R Case No. 1185 of 2024 pending on the file of learned J. M. F. C. , Kujanga for alleged commission of offences under sections 126(2), 118(1), 296, 351(3), 109 of B. N. S. The prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Kujang vide order dated 22. 11. 2024. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 08. 11.
2024, and the inured Sushant Nayak sustained injury, which is stated to have been inflicted by ‘Chapad’, but the doctor opined the same to be simple in nature and after hearing the learned counsel for the State, who submitted that the petitioner is having two criminal antecedents and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that those cases arise out of a family dispute, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Let the petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin over the matter with further conditions that the petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activities and shall appear before the learned trial Court on each date to which the case would be posted for trial. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules. ( S. K. Sahoo) Judge PkSahoo Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PRAMOD KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 24-Dec-2024 12:59:47
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.