PRABHAT KALITA v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS.
Court: Gauhati High Court
Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
Judgment date:
Case summary
Gauhati High Court judgment dated 2020-12-22. PRABHAT KALITA v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
Page No. # 1/3 GAHC010192942020 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I. A. (Civil)/2311/2020 PRABHAT KALITA S/O. LATE SRIRAM KALITA, R/O. VILL. BOHOTIAGAON, TARAJAN, BAPUJI NAGAR, P. O. R. R. L, P. S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:BRANCH MANAGER KATAIKIPUKHURI BRANCH P. O. R. R. L DIST- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001 3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT 4:OFFICER-IN-CHARGE JORHAT P. S. DIST- JORHAT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM Page No. # 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/6324/2018 PRABHAT KALITA S/O- LT SIRAM KALITA R/O- VILL- BOHOTIAGAON TARAJAN BAPUJI NAGAR P. O. R. R. L P. S. JORHAT DIST- JORHAT (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. REP.
BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER LOCAL HEAD OFFICE DISPUR GHY KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 2:BRANCH MANAGER KATAIKIPUKHURI BRANCH P. O. R. R. L DIST- JORHAT ASSAM PIN- 785001 3:SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT 4:OFFICER-IN-CHARGE JORHAT P. S. DIST- JORHAT ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. M BISWAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS. Page No. # 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 22-12-2020 Heard Shri M. Biswas, learned counsel for the applicant who has filed this application for correction of a typographical error which was inadvertently made in the writ petition. The bank account which was the subject matter was written in the petition 1039341971 which has been reflected in the order dated 15. 12. 2020. However, the same should be 10392341971. Accordingly, the order dated 15. 12. 2020 stands corrected by correctly stating the bank account as 10392341971.
The present order may be read as a part of the order dated 15. 12. 2020. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.