BABU SINGH RAGHUVANSHI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Court: High Court of Madhya Pradesh
Judgment date:
Case summary
High Court of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 2024-01-22. BABU SINGH RAGHUVANSHI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH. Read the judgment and case details on LawSphereX.
Judgment text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT GWALIOR BEFORE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND RAMESH PHADKE nd ON THE 22 OF JANUARY, 2024 WRIT PETITION No. 1610 of 2024 BETWEEN:- 1. BABU SINGH RAGHUVANSHI S/O SHRI NATHAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCCUPATION: RETIRED VILLAGE NAGAU KHEDI DISTRICT ASHOKNAGAR (M. P. ) (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. RAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI S/O SHRI MAN SINGH, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE SADUMRA POST SEJI ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. BABU SINGH RAGHUVANSHI S/O SHRI UDHAM SINGH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O VILLAGE SOBAT POST KHAMKHEDI ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI S. S. RAGHUVANSHI - ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY VALLABH BHAWAN, BHOPAL M. P. (MADHYA PRADESH) 2. DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER ASHOKNAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) 3. JOINT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF TREASURY AND ACCOUNTS GWALIOR AND CHAMBAL DIVISION OTIMAHAL, GWALIOR (MADHYA PRADESH) ..... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI S. S.
KUSHWAH - GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for hearing this day, th e court passed the Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU Signing time: 1/23/2024 4:21:50 PM following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this matter is covered by the judgment delivered by this Court in Smt. Prerna Vs. State of M. P. & Others, {W. P. 6773/06 (s)} . He submits that the petitioner intends to prefer representation, which may be directed to be decided expeditiously by respondents No. 2 & 3. I n absence of any opposition, the petition is disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case with direction to the petitioner to file representation along with copy of this order before respondents No. 2 & 3.
In turn, the said respondents shall consider and decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order within three months therefrom in accordance with rules by taking into account the judgment in Prerna's case and examine whether the petitioner is similarly situated or not. If the said authorities come to the conclusion that the petitioner is similarly situated, the same benefit be extended in favour of the present petitioner also within the same time. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of. E-copy/certified copy as per rules. (MILIND RAMESH PHADKE) JUDGE neetu Signature Not Verified Signed by: NEETU Signing time: 1/23/2024 4:21:50 PM
Source: Supreme Court eSCR. Dataset: Dattam Labs, CC BY 4.0. Text extracted automatically; compare with the source PDF for layout and accuracy.